P43 Noninvasive, mechanical characterization of skin and the effects of ageing; comparing automated and manually actuated indenters

Abstract Introduction and aims Skin is subject to structural and mechanical remodelling because of intrinsic and extrinsic ageing. Invasive skin biopsies, while informative of composition and architecture at a single timepoint, do not provide insights into longitudinal changes and are subject to clinical risks. Noninvasive mechanical characterization of skin is commonly undertaken with devices that cannot measure formal biomechanical properties. Comparing an automated indenter with a novel portable, manual indenter, this study aimed to noninvasively characterize the effects of ageing on biomechanical properties. Methods Twelve healthy White participants were recruited: young (n = 7; 24.1 ± 1.0 years) and aged (n = 5; 68.2 ± 5.2 years). Testing was performed within 30 × 30 mm regions of interest on the volar and dorsal forearm. Viscoelastic indentation was performed using a CETR UMT (Universal Mechanics Testing) machine and a bespoke manual indenter, both with the same 5-mm spherical probe. During indentation, the probe was lowered into the skin until a load of 0.3 N was reached, where it was held before being retracted. This generated load vs. indentation curves from which the skin’s stiffness (E) and viscoelastic recovery from mechanical load (W) were found. Results Both the indenters showed a reduction in with respect to age: EUMT decreased by 36.0% in volar and 24.6% dorsal; EManual decreased by 55.0% and 48.4%, respectively. Conversely, W increased with respect to age: WUMT increased by 53.3% in the volar forearm and 35.0% the dorsal forearm; WManual increased by 121.2% and 140.9%, respectively. Conclusions Both the automated and manual indenter were able to differentiate between age cohorts. While the manual indenter showed greater variability, its values remained comparable to the UMT, giving confidence in the ability to measure biomechanical properties on location. Future work will include further investigations involving other ethnicities and running a study with noninvasive and invasive measurements on the same cohort and finding predictive links between them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf429.070
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P43 Noninvasive, mechanical characterization of skin and the effects of ageing; comparing automated and manually actuated indenters

Robert B. Irwin, Marc Arthur Masen, Michael J. Sherratt, Margarida Santos
British Journal of Dermatology
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

P43 Noninvasive, mechanical characterization of skin and the effects of ageing; comparing automated and manually actuated indenters

Robert B. Irwin, Marc Arthur Masen, Michael J. Sherratt, Margarida Santos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and aims Skin is subject to structural and mechanical remodelling because of intrinsic and extrinsic ageing. Invasive skin biopsies, while informative of composition and architecture at a single timepoint, do not provide insights into longitudinal changes and are subject to clinical risks. Noninvasive mechanical characterization of skin is commonly undertaken with devices that cannot measure formal biomechanical properties. Comparing an automated indenter with a novel portable, manual indenter, this study aimed to noninvasively characterize the effects of ageing on biomechanical properties. Methods Twelve healthy White participants were recruited: young (n = 7; 24.1 ± 1.0 years) and aged (n = 5; 68.2 ± 5.2 years). Testing was performed within 30 × 30 mm regions of interest on the volar and dorsal forearm. Viscoelastic indentation was performed using a CETR UMT (Universal Mechanics Testing) machine and a bespoke manual indenter, both with the same 5-mm spherical probe. During indentation, the probe was lowered into the skin until a load of 0.3 N was reached, where it was held before being retracted. This generated load vs. indentation curves from which the skin’s stiffness (E) and viscoelastic recovery from mechanical load (W) were found. Results Both the indenters showed a reduction in with respect to age: EUMT decreased by 36.0% in volar and 24.6% dorsal; EManual decreased by 55.0% and 48.4%, respectively. Conversely, W increased with respect to age: WUMT increased by 53.3% in the volar forearm and 35.0% the dorsal forearm; WManual increased by 121.2% and 140.9%, respectively. Conclusions Both the automated and manual indenter were able to differentiate between age cohorts. While the manual indenter showed greater variability, its values remained comparable to the UMT, giving confidence in the ability to measure biomechanical properties on location. Future work will include further investigations involving other ethnicities and running a study with noninvasive and invasive measurements on the same cohort and finding predictive links between them.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 194(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Chrysalis Health & Beauty (United Kingdom) (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.