Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on Suitable Distribution of <i>Rhodiola</i> Species in the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau: Modeling Insights for Conservation Prioritization

Using the MaxEnt model with climatic, topographical, soil, and human activity factors, this study predicted suitable habitats for eight <i>Rhodiola</i> species in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) and analyzed conservation gaps via ArcGIS overlay analysis. Models demonstrated high accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.88 to 0.99. Human activities dominated habitat suitability for most species (contribution: 37.0%-76.4%), except <i>R. atsaensis</i> (RA), driven by climate (38.9%) and topography (32.8%). Current suitable habitats varied widely, with RA occupying the largest area (1.69 × 10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>), and <i>R. sacra</i> (RS) the smallest (5.61 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>). Future climate scenarios show seven <i>Rhodiola</i> species (except RS) will expand, and all have increasing highly suitable areas. <i>R. smithii</i> and <i>R. tibetica</i> expand most; RS only expands under SSP1-2.6 in 2090. Current nature reserve coverage protects 33.42% of the suitable habitats for <i>Rhodiola</i> species on the plateau, with national reserves accounting for 28.13% and other protected areas (PAs) only 5.29%. Protection efficiency varies significantly among species. RA has the highest protection rate (35.38%), while <i>R. bupleuroides</i> and RS show the lowest (~20%). National reserves exhibit protection rates of 13.11%-29.98% for suitable habitats, surpassing other-level reserves (2.1%-8.27%). Conservation gaps are concentrated in ecologically sensitive zones such as the Hotan-Ngari, Lhasa, and eastern Chamdo. Strikingly, protection of high and medium habitats remains extremely low (5.12%). The findings provide critical insights for prioritizing strategic conservation efforts and optimizing PA networks across the QTP, thereby addressing the current protection gaps and enhancing ecological connectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72896
Primary Topic
Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on Suitable Distribution of Rhodiola Species in the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau: Modeling Insights for Conservation Prioritization

Lu Wang, Bo Liu, Xue Li, Kun Jin et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
article

Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on Suitable Distribution of Rhodiola Species in the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau: Modeling Insights for Conservation Prioritization

Lu Wang, Bo Liu, Xue Li, Kun Jin, Ao‐jie Zuo, Jing‐kai Zhang, Yang‐Jing Peng, Ai‐Li Qin
article en

Abstract

Using the MaxEnt model with climatic, topographical, soil, and human activity factors, this study predicted suitable habitats for eight <i>Rhodiola</i> species in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) and analyzed conservation gaps via ArcGIS overlay analysis. Models demonstrated high accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.88 to 0.99. Human activities dominated habitat suitability for most species (contribution: 37.0%-76.4%), except <i>R. atsaensis</i> (RA), driven by climate (38.9%) and topography (32.8%). Current suitable habitats varied widely, with RA occupying the largest area (1.69 × 10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>), and <i>R. sacra</i> (RS) the smallest (5.61 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>). Future climate scenarios show seven <i>Rhodiola</i> species (except RS) will expand, and all have increasing highly suitable areas. <i>R. smithii</i> and <i>R. tibetica</i> expand most; RS only expands under SSP1-2.6 in 2090. Current nature reserve coverage protects 33.42% of the suitable habitats for <i>Rhodiola</i> species on the plateau, with national reserves accounting for 28.13% and other protected areas (PAs) only 5.29%. Protection efficiency varies significantly among species. RA has the highest protection rate (35.38%), while <i>R. bupleuroides</i> and RS show the lowest (~20%). National reserves exhibit protection rates of 13.11%-29.98% for suitable habitats, surpassing other-level reserves (2.1%-8.27%). Conservation gaps are concentrated in ecologically sensitive zones such as the Hotan-Ngari, Lhasa, and eastern Chamdo. Strikingly, protection of high and medium habitats remains extremely low (5.12%). The findings provide critical insights for prioritizing strategic conservation efforts and optimizing PA networks across the QTP, thereby addressing the current protection gaps and enhancing ecological connectivity.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(1)
Minzu University of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Research Institute of Forestry (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN), Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information (CN), Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection (CN), Zhejiang Academy of Forestry (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.