A Retentive Field Formalism: Definition, Thresholds, and Non-Violation Dynamics

This paper introduces a minimal retentive formalism for describing the persistence of distinguishability in systems operating beyond standard dynamical regimes. The framework is defined through three core elements: retentive difference (Δψ), retentive nodes (Ξ), and protocol time (τ), without invoking energy, action, or classical dynamics. A retentive functional is formulated as an operational construct rather than a physical energy, together with empirical threshold conditions that delimit the domain of applicability. A Non-Violation Criterion (Ψ-NVP) is introduced as a fundamental constraint on admissible protocol interactions, prohibiting amplification of retained difference under intervention. The formalism is completed by a single demonstrative protocol and a strict distinguishability analysis, explicitly clarifying what the framework is not: it is neither dynamical, nor information-theoretic, nor an optimization or control scheme. The result is a closed, reproducible, and ethically minimal mathematical framework for post-dynamic stability, intended as a foundational reference for subsequent theoretical and applied work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18169149
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retentive Field Formalism: Definition, Thresholds, and Non-Violation Dynamics

Logacheva Yulia
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Formal Methods in Verification
article

A Retentive Field Formalism: Definition, Thresholds, and Non-Violation Dynamics

Logacheva Yulia
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a minimal retentive formalism for describing the persistence of distinguishability in systems operating beyond standard dynamical regimes. The framework is defined through three core elements: retentive difference (Δψ), retentive nodes (Ξ), and protocol time (τ), without invoking energy, action, or classical dynamics. A retentive functional is formulated as an operational construct rather than a physical energy, together with empirical threshold conditions that delimit the domain of applicability. A Non-Violation Criterion (Ψ-NVP) is introduced as a fundamental constraint on admissible protocol interactions, prohibiting amplification of retained difference under intervention. The formalism is completed by a single demonstrative protocol and a strict distinguishability analysis, explicitly clarifying what the framework is not: it is neither dynamical, nor information-theoretic, nor an optimization or control scheme. The result is a closed, reproducible, and ethically minimal mathematical framework for post-dynamic stability, intended as a foundational reference for subsequent theoretical and applied work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Retentive Field Formalism: Definition, Thresholds, and Non-Violation Dynamics — Logacheva Yulia · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS