AI in project teams: how trust calibration reconfigures team's collaboration and performance

Purpose As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in project-based work, trust calibration, ensuring that trust in AI systems is neither excessive nor insufficient, emerges as a key factor for effective collaboration. This study explores how project professionals calibrate trust in AI and how this process influences team collaboration and performance in technology-mediated project environments. Design/methodology/approach Guided by socio-technical systems theory (STS) complemented by adaptive structuration theory (AST), the study draws on 40 semi-structured interviews with project professionals across diverse UK industries. Thematic analysis is used to explore participants' lived experiences of trust calibration, collaboration mechanisms and perceived team performance in AI-supported settings. Findings The result indicates that trust in AI is situational, socially distributed and shaped through ongoing boundary work between human and machine inputs. Enablers such as transparency, role clarity, user experience, cultural norms and system feedback shape calibration processes. These processes, in turn, influenced collaboration (e.g. delegation of oversight and erosion of informal communication) and performance (e.g. metric-driven evaluation and strategic augmentation of human expertise). Originality/value This study contributes to project management and AI adoption research by conceptualising trust calibration as a socio-technical process embedded in team routines, rather than as an individual attitude. It offers an initial conceptual model and a revised conceptual model that links enablers, practices, and outcomes of trust calibration, demonstrating how trust mediates the relationship between AI integration, collaboration and performance. Beyond applying existing frameworks, this research extends STS and AST by developing new theoretical insights into trust calibration as a mechanism linking AI design, collaboration dynamics and project performance. Findings provide practical guidance for designing trust-aware, human-centred AI practices in project environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-07-2025-0285
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in project teams: how trust calibration reconfigures team's collaboration and performance

Vincent Dutot, Viraj Dawarka, Melina Seedoyal Doargajudhur
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

AI in project teams: how trust calibration reconfigures team's collaboration and performance

Vincent Dutot, Viraj Dawarka, Melina Seedoyal Doargajudhur
article en

Abstract

Purpose As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in project-based work, trust calibration, ensuring that trust in AI systems is neither excessive nor insufficient, emerges as a key factor for effective collaboration. This study explores how project professionals calibrate trust in AI and how this process influences team collaboration and performance in technology-mediated project environments. Design/methodology/approach Guided by socio-technical systems theory (STS) complemented by adaptive structuration theory (AST), the study draws on 40 semi-structured interviews with project professionals across diverse UK industries. Thematic analysis is used to explore participants' lived experiences of trust calibration, collaboration mechanisms and perceived team performance in AI-supported settings. Findings The result indicates that trust in AI is situational, socially distributed and shaped through ongoing boundary work between human and machine inputs. Enablers such as transparency, role clarity, user experience, cultural norms and system feedback shape calibration processes. These processes, in turn, influenced collaboration (e.g. delegation of oversight and erosion of informal communication) and performance (e.g. metric-driven evaluation and strategic augmentation of human expertise). Originality/value This study contributes to project management and AI adoption research by conceptualising trust calibration as a socio-technical process embedded in team routines, rather than as an individual attitude. It offers an initial conceptual model and a revised conceptual model that links enablers, practices, and outcomes of trust calibration, demonstrating how trust mediates the relationship between AI integration, collaboration and performance. Beyond applying existing frameworks, this research extends STS and AST by developing new theoretical insights into trust calibration as a mechanism linking AI design, collaboration dynamics and project performance. Findings provide practical guidance for designing trust-aware, human-centred AI practices in project environments.

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
University of Staffordshire (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Métis-Lab (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.