Assessing warm saline's role in alleviating pain in office hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of using warm saline as a distension medium compared to room temperature saline in reducing pain and improving patient satisfaction during office hysteroscopy. Methodology: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251074073), we systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for RCTs from inception to June 2025. Our search combined MeSH terms and keywords related to hysteroscopy, distension media, and pain management. We included RCTs that compared warm and room temperature saline in women undergoing diagnostic or operative office hysteroscopy. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MD) and dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using RevMan software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to address variability. Results: Our meta-analysis included seven RCTs with a total of 541 women. Warm saline significantly reduced pain during the procedure, with a mean difference of -0.92 (95% CI: -1.50 to -0.34, p=0.002), despite high heterogeneity (I² = 83%). Post-procedure pain also significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.47 (95% CI: -0.79,-0.150, p = 0.004), and heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 67%). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with warmed saline, with an odds ratio of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.49 to 4.91, p=0.001), although heterogeneity remained moderate (I² = 44%). Conclusion: Warm saline as a distension medium during office hysteroscopy significantly reduces procedural pain and enhances patient satisfaction. These findings support the adoption of warm saline to improve patient experience and compliance, promoting a more patientcentered approach in gynecological care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18151521
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing warm saline's role in alleviating pain in office hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eman Al-Shehri, A. A. NADA, Sherif Edris, Alatawi Atallah Mohammed et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Assessing warm saline's role in alleviating pain in office hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eman Al-Shehri, A. A. NADA, Sherif Edris, Alatawi Atallah Mohammed, A. Rezk Omar, Binsaeedan Shadan, Abdelrazeq Mohammed, Al Hawamdeh Sondos, Neyazi Salwa, Akkour Khalid, Atlam Mohammad, Abdelsalam Karim, Khedr Alhassan
article en

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of using warm saline as a distension medium compared to room temperature saline in reducing pain and improving patient satisfaction during office hysteroscopy. Methodology: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251074073), we systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for RCTs from inception to June 2025. Our search combined MeSH terms and keywords related to hysteroscopy, distension media, and pain management. We included RCTs that compared warm and room temperature saline in women undergoing diagnostic or operative office hysteroscopy. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MD) and dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using RevMan software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to address variability. Results: Our meta-analysis included seven RCTs with a total of 541 women. Warm saline significantly reduced pain during the procedure, with a mean difference of -0.92 (95% CI: -1.50 to -0.34, p=0.002), despite high heterogeneity (I² = 83%). Post-procedure pain also significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.47 (95% CI: -0.79,-0.150, p = 0.004), and heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 67%). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with warmed saline, with an odds ratio of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.49 to 4.91, p=0.001), although heterogeneity remained moderate (I² = 44%). Conclusion: Warm saline as a distension medium during office hysteroscopy significantly reduces procedural pain and enhances patient satisfaction. These findings support the adoption of warm saline to improve patient experience and compliance, promoting a more patientcentered approach in gynecological care.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ain Shams University (EG), Al-Azhar University (EG), Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges (SA), King Saud University (SA), Hera General Hospital (SA), University of Tabuk (SA), Helwan University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.