Time-varying capital ratios under CECL

We investigate how to design time-varying capital ratios under CECL accounting to maximize joint surplus of debtholders and equityholders of a bank. In stark contrast to the Basel III Accord, we highlight the role of intertemporal connections to design capital ratios that vary across business cycles. We derive two main results. (1) The optimal capital ratio is tighter for anticipated cycle turns and looser for anticipated cycle persistence for highly levered banks relative to the benchmark of absent intertemporal correlation of shocks to loans. (2) The optimal capital ratio is looser for an anticipated downturn and tighter for an anticipated upturn relative to the benchmark of absent intertemporal change in liquidity demand for deposits. Comparing the CECL model under U.S. GAAP with the ECL model under IFRS shows that the optimal capital ratios are more stringent under ECL than under CECL. Nevertheless, both models yield identical equilibrium risk-shifting incentives for banks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Accounting
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2025.100865
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-varying capital ratios under CECL

Lanyi Yan Zhang, Tong Lu
Advances in Accounting
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

Time-varying capital ratios under CECL

Lanyi Yan Zhang, Tong Lu
article en

Abstract

We investigate how to design time-varying capital ratios under CECL accounting to maximize joint surplus of debtholders and equityholders of a bank. In stark contrast to the Basel III Accord, we highlight the role of intertemporal connections to design capital ratios that vary across business cycles. We derive two main results. (1) The optimal capital ratio is tighter for anticipated cycle turns and looser for anticipated cycle persistence for highly levered banks relative to the benchmark of absent intertemporal correlation of shocks to loans. (2) The optimal capital ratio is looser for an anticipated downturn and tighter for an anticipated upturn relative to the benchmark of absent intertemporal change in liquidity demand for deposits. Comparing the CECL model under U.S. GAAP with the ECL model under IFRS shows that the optimal capital ratios are more stringent under ECL than under CECL. Nevertheless, both models yield identical equilibrium risk-shifting incentives for banks.

Advances in AccountingVol. 70
University of Houston - Downtown (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Time-varying capital ratios under CECL — Lanyi Yan Zhang, Tong Lu · Advances in Accounting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS