Chatbots for reference services in academic libraries: Applications and trends

As academic libraries adapt to evolving to meet changing user expectations and digital service models, chatbots have emerged as a promising tool for enhancing reference support. This study investigates the current landscape of chatbot applications in academic library settings by examining both rule-based and AI-powered systems deployed across institutions around the world. Through a comprehensive environmental scan and literature review, 31 library chatbots were selected representing a diverse range of service models and technological maturity. The study assesses the chatbot performance, responsiveness, and ethical transparency through a set of structured queries, including service-related questions, information retrieval tasks, and conversational prompts. It reveals a generally low global adoption rate of chatbots in academic libraries, with development varying significantly across regions. Notably, 94 % of the chatbots were AI-powered or hybrid systems, and 42 % offered multilingual support. Most chatbots performed reliably on basic service queries, yet only some of them demonstrated strategic messaging or extended service capabilities. Significant variation was observed in semantic interpretation and recommendation quality, with many chatbots struggling to deliver contextually relevant or metadata-rich responses. Critically, only 13 % disclosed privacy policies which reveals the widespread gaps in ethical transparency and user awareness. These findings underscore the need for improved semantic modeling, broader service integration, and clearer documentation to ensure that AI-enabled library systems align with institutional values and meet diverse user needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103197
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chatbots for reference services in academic libraries: Applications and trends

Guoying Liu, Shu Liu
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
AI in Service Interactions
article

Chatbots for reference services in academic libraries: Applications and trends

Guoying Liu, Shu Liu
article en

Abstract

As academic libraries adapt to evolving to meet changing user expectations and digital service models, chatbots have emerged as a promising tool for enhancing reference support. This study investigates the current landscape of chatbot applications in academic library settings by examining both rule-based and AI-powered systems deployed across institutions around the world. Through a comprehensive environmental scan and literature review, 31 library chatbots were selected representing a diverse range of service models and technological maturity. The study assesses the chatbot performance, responsiveness, and ethical transparency through a set of structured queries, including service-related questions, information retrieval tasks, and conversational prompts. It reveals a generally low global adoption rate of chatbots in academic libraries, with development varying significantly across regions. Notably, 94 % of the chatbots were AI-powered or hybrid systems, and 42 % offered multilingual support. Most chatbots performed reliably on basic service queries, yet only some of them demonstrated strategic messaging or extended service capabilities. Significant variation was observed in semantic interpretation and recommendation quality, with many chatbots struggling to deliver contextually relevant or metadata-rich responses. Critically, only 13 % disclosed privacy policies which reveals the widespread gaps in ethical transparency and user awareness. These findings underscore the need for improved semantic modeling, broader service integration, and clearer documentation to ensure that AI-enabled library systems align with institutional values and meet diverse user needs.

The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipVol. 52(1)
Peking University (CN), University of Windsor (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.