Integrating Co-Created and Theory-Driven Insights: A Worked Example Using an Equitable and Power Sharing Approach

Co-creation with citizens has emerged as an integral component in tackling a plethora of healthcare inequities. At the stage of scientific conceptualization, processes of integrating co-created insights as legitimate forms of knowledge lack transparent methods, risking disempowerment for citizens who have been positioned as influencing research processes and outcomes. We detail an approach to integrating co-created insights into a scientific model using an equitable and power-sharing approach (EPSA) method, exampled during the study design phase of the AFFIRM Relationships project. The EPSA method consists of three phases: a preparatory phase (researcher reflexivity, topic formulation and sensitization); a co-creation phase (knowledge production, analytic phases, summarizing and ethics work) and an insight integration phase. Applying the EPSA method highlighted the important role of researcher reflexivity in preparing to foster a safe environment for open dialogue during co-creation. Transforming scientific research stages into activities that can engage co-researchers (including conducting analysis, critical thinking, and producing overarching themes) underscored an equitable partnership. While the final phase enabled identification of how resulting knowledge was derived (i.e., via co-creation or existing theory), further consideration of how refinement processes can be grounded in lived experience is necessary, particularly during final stages as decision-making becomes increasingly led by academic team members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251381898
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Co-Created and Theory-Driven Insights: A Worked Example Using an Equitable and Power Sharing Approach

Nessa Millet, David M. Doyle, Breanna W. Bosman, Reney Karsten et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
46.02
article

Integrating Co-Created and Theory-Driven Insights: A Worked Example Using an Equitable and Power Sharing Approach

Nessa Millet, David M. Doyle, Breanna W. Bosman, Reney Karsten, Sammy Albader, Baudewijntje P. C. Kreukels
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Co-creation with citizens has emerged as an integral component in tackling a plethora of healthcare inequities. At the stage of scientific conceptualization, processes of integrating co-created insights as legitimate forms of knowledge lack transparent methods, risking disempowerment for citizens who have been positioned as influencing research processes and outcomes. We detail an approach to integrating co-created insights into a scientific model using an equitable and power-sharing approach (EPSA) method, exampled during the study design phase of the AFFIRM Relationships project. The EPSA method consists of three phases: a preparatory phase (researcher reflexivity, topic formulation and sensitization); a co-creation phase (knowledge production, analytic phases, summarizing and ethics work) and an insight integration phase. Applying the EPSA method highlighted the important role of researcher reflexivity in preparing to foster a safe environment for open dialogue during co-creation. Transforming scientific research stages into activities that can engage co-researchers (including conducting analysis, critical thinking, and producing overarching themes) underscored an equitable partnership. While the final phase enabled identification of how resulting knowledge was derived (i.e., via co-creation or existing theory), further consideration of how refinement processes can be grounded in lived experience is necessary, particularly during final stages as decision-making becomes increasingly led by academic team members.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
Utrecht University (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
46.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.