Multicenter, Multinational, and Multivendor Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Application for Acute Cervical Spine Fracture Detection on CT

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> While previous studies have evaluated AI algorithms for cervical spine fracture (CSFx) detection on CT, many have lacked validation on diverse, multinational datasets or have focused primarily on overall case-level classification This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI application for acute CSFx detection in case-level classification, fracture localization, and spinal level labeling on multicenter, multinational, and multivendor CT data. <b>Methods:</b> Non-enhanced CTs were retrospectively collected from a U.S. teleradiology company, a French teleradiology company, and a U.S. university hospital. Four radiologists independently labeled the presence and location (including the spinal level) of acute CSFx to establish the reference standard. Per-case diagnostic performance, per-bounding box positive predictive value (PPV) for localization, and overall agreement of cervical vertebral level labeling of the AI were assessed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 155 patients (60.6 years ± 21.2 years, 104 men) with acute CSFx and 173 patients (51.9 years ± 22.7 years, 91 men) without acute CSFx were evaluated. Data were acquired using scanners from five manufacturers. For acute CSFx diagnosis, the AI achieved a per-case sensitivity of 90.3%, a specificity of 91.9%, an accuracy of 91.2%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91, and Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.82. Among 192 bounding boxes representing acute CSFx generated for 154 positive cases by the AI, 162 were true positives (per-bounding box PPV, 84.4%). Of the 186 bounding boxes for which the AI displayed cervical spinal level, 181 were labeled correctly (overall agreement, 97.3%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The AI application for detecting acute CSFx demonstrated high diagnostic performance on multicenter, multinational, and multivendor data, with high performance in fracture localization and spinal level labeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020194
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter, Multinational, and Multivendor Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Application for Acute Cervical Spine Fracture Detection on CT

Daniel Chow, Angela Ayobi, Peter Chang, Martina Cotena et al.
Diagnostics
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Multicenter, Multinational, and Multivendor Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Application for Acute Cervical Spine Fracture Detection on CT

Daniel Chow, Angela Ayobi, Peter Chang, Martina Cotena, Mar Roca-Sogorb, Jinhee Jang, Jinkyeong Sung, Yasmina Chaibi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> While previous studies have evaluated AI algorithms for cervical spine fracture (CSFx) detection on CT, many have lacked validation on diverse, multinational datasets or have focused primarily on overall case-level classification This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI application for acute CSFx detection in case-level classification, fracture localization, and spinal level labeling on multicenter, multinational, and multivendor CT data. <b>Methods:</b> Non-enhanced CTs were retrospectively collected from a U.S. teleradiology company, a French teleradiology company, and a U.S. university hospital. Four radiologists independently labeled the presence and location (including the spinal level) of acute CSFx to establish the reference standard. Per-case diagnostic performance, per-bounding box positive predictive value (PPV) for localization, and overall agreement of cervical vertebral level labeling of the AI were assessed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 155 patients (60.6 years ± 21.2 years, 104 men) with acute CSFx and 173 patients (51.9 years ± 22.7 years, 91 men) without acute CSFx were evaluated. Data were acquired using scanners from five manufacturers. For acute CSFx diagnosis, the AI achieved a per-case sensitivity of 90.3%, a specificity of 91.9%, an accuracy of 91.2%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91, and Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.82. Among 192 bounding boxes representing acute CSFx generated for 154 positive cases by the AI, 162 were true positives (per-bounding box PPV, 84.4%). Of the 186 bounding boxes for which the AI displayed cervical spinal level, 181 were labeled correctly (overall agreement, 97.3%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The AI application for detecting acute CSFx demonstrated high diagnostic performance on multicenter, multinational, and multivendor data, with high performance in fracture localization and spinal level labeling.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
University of California, Irvine (US), St. Mary's Hospital (US), University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US), Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.