Membranous Interacting Partners of Phage‐Type Plastid RNA Polymerase Have Limited Impact on Plastid Gene Expression During Chloroplast Development

In vascular plants, genes in the plastid genome are transcribed by two types of RNA polymerases, namely, phage-type nuclear-encoded and bacterial-type plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerases (NEP and PEP, respectively). Eudicots, including Arabidopsis, carry two isoforms of NEP, RPOTp and RPOTmp. NEPs transcribe multiple plastid-encoded genes including subunits of PEP and translocon and are thus indispensable for the maintenance of plastids. However, regulatory mechanisms of NEPs are largely unknown. RPOTmp transcribes the 16S rRNA gene from a specific promoter in the seeds during vernalization, and its mutation in Arabidopsis retards chloroplast development. As interacting partners of RPOTmp, two NEP-INTERACTING PROTEINs (NIP1 and NIP2) have been identified and suggested to suppress RPOTmp activity by tethering RPOTmp to the thylakoid membrane during chloroplast development in the presence of light, but their precise roles in transcriptional regulation remain to be addressed. From these previous reports, we hypothesize that the functions of RPOTmp would depend on the light conditions and expression of NIPs. To gain insight into how RPOTmp is controlled, we performed a functional analysis of RPOTmp and NIPs using Arabidopsis mutants during germination in the dark and de-etiolation processes under light. We found that RPOTmp-dependent transcription of 16S rRNA is active in imbibed seeds and remains at a basal level throughout the postgermination processes, regardless of light conditions. We also demonstrated a limited impact of NIPs on RPOTmp function during these processes. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that NIPs have distinct evolutionary profiles compared with RPOTmp, and Arabidopsis is unlikely to have additional NIP-like proteins in plastids. Based on these findings, we propose a modified model of RPOTmp regulation during chloroplast development: RPOTmp activity remains stable throughout the process of chloroplast differentiation and is unaffected by light and NIPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Direct
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70122
Primary Topic
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Membranous Interacting Partners of Phage‐Type Plastid RNA Polymerase Have Limited Impact on Plastid Gene Expression During Chloroplast Development

Sho Fujii, Atsuo Nishino, Yushi Kurotaki, Yuki Hagiwara et al.
Plant Direct
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
article

Membranous Interacting Partners of Phage‐Type Plastid RNA Polymerase Have Limited Impact on Plastid Gene Expression During Chloroplast Development

Sho Fujii, Atsuo Nishino, Yushi Kurotaki, Yuki Hagiwara, Kosei Noto
article en

Abstract

In vascular plants, genes in the plastid genome are transcribed by two types of RNA polymerases, namely, phage-type nuclear-encoded and bacterial-type plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerases (NEP and PEP, respectively). Eudicots, including Arabidopsis, carry two isoforms of NEP, RPOTp and RPOTmp. NEPs transcribe multiple plastid-encoded genes including subunits of PEP and translocon and are thus indispensable for the maintenance of plastids. However, regulatory mechanisms of NEPs are largely unknown. RPOTmp transcribes the 16S rRNA gene from a specific promoter in the seeds during vernalization, and its mutation in Arabidopsis retards chloroplast development. As interacting partners of RPOTmp, two NEP-INTERACTING PROTEINs (NIP1 and NIP2) have been identified and suggested to suppress RPOTmp activity by tethering RPOTmp to the thylakoid membrane during chloroplast development in the presence of light, but their precise roles in transcriptional regulation remain to be addressed. From these previous reports, we hypothesize that the functions of RPOTmp would depend on the light conditions and expression of NIPs. To gain insight into how RPOTmp is controlled, we performed a functional analysis of RPOTmp and NIPs using Arabidopsis mutants during germination in the dark and de-etiolation processes under light. We found that RPOTmp-dependent transcription of 16S rRNA is active in imbibed seeds and remains at a basal level throughout the postgermination processes, regardless of light conditions. We also demonstrated a limited impact of NIPs on RPOTmp function during these processes. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that NIPs have distinct evolutionary profiles compared with RPOTmp, and Arabidopsis is unlikely to have additional NIP-like proteins in plastids. Based on these findings, we propose a modified model of RPOTmp regulation during chloroplast development: RPOTmp activity remains stable throughout the process of chloroplast differentiation and is unaffected by light and NIPs.

Plant DirectVol. 10(1)
Hirosaki University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.