Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction: a 15-year population-based study

The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very elderly patients (> 90 years) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains debated due to limited evidence and the presence of multimorbidity. This study evaluated the impact of PCI using data from the Lombardy Health Database (Italy) for AMI patients hospitalized between 2003 and 2018. Among 15,954 patients (median age 92; 71% female; 50% with ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]), 12% underwent PCI. In-hospital mortality was lower in PCI-treated patients (15% vs. 23%; P < 0.0001). Overall, one-year mortality (56%) and rehospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) or AMI (19%) were also reduced among PCI patients (37% vs. 58% and 16% vs. 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). These findings were consistent across both STEMI and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) subgroups and were independent of comorbidities. Adjusted risk analyses and propensity score matching (1,950 patients per group) confirmed these benefits. The use of PCI increased significantly from 4% in 2003 to 22% in 2018, while in-hospital mortality declined from 22 to 19% (from 28 to 15% in the propensity-matched cohort). In conclusion, PCI was associated with significantly lower in-hospital and one-year mortality, as well as reduced rehospitalization rates, in AMI patients older than 90 years, regardless of comorbidities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33662-8
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction: a 15-year population-based study

Filippo Trombara, Nicola Cosentino, Olivia Leoni, Alice Bonomi et al.
Scientific Reports
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction: a 15-year population-based study

Filippo Trombara, Nicola Cosentino, Olivia Leoni, Alice Bonomi, Daniela Mele, Giampaolo D’Aleo, Paolo Poggio, Giancarlo Silvio Marenzi, Stefano Savonitto, Claudia Lucci, Piergiuseppe Agostoni
article en

Abstract

The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very elderly patients (> 90 years) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains debated due to limited evidence and the presence of multimorbidity. This study evaluated the impact of PCI using data from the Lombardy Health Database (Italy) for AMI patients hospitalized between 2003 and 2018. Among 15,954 patients (median age 92; 71% female; 50% with ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]), 12% underwent PCI. In-hospital mortality was lower in PCI-treated patients (15% vs. 23%; P < 0.0001). Overall, one-year mortality (56%) and rehospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) or AMI (19%) were also reduced among PCI patients (37% vs. 58% and 16% vs. 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). These findings were consistent across both STEMI and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) subgroups and were independent of comorbidities. Adjusted risk analyses and propensity score matching (1,950 patients per group) confirmed these benefits. The use of PCI increased significantly from 4% in 2003 to 22% in 2018, while in-hospital mortality declined from 22 to 19% (from 28 to 15% in the propensity-matched cohort). In conclusion, PCI was associated with significantly lower in-hospital and one-year mortality, as well as reduced rehospitalization rates, in AMI patients older than 90 years, regardless of comorbidities.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Milan (IT), Centro Cardiologico Monzino (IT), Regione Lombardia
Ministero della Salute, Regione Lombardia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.