Agile Ethics: AI Governance Debate Case Study

<p>I have then been picturing a classroom debate about government regulation in AI. I think that this would appeal to my audience of mostly engineering majors. Over the summer in the AI4ALL summer camp, Dr Steven Kelts led a great ethics debate with the students, and I am hoping to emulate that by partitioning the SML 301 students into 4 roles such as</p> <ol type="1"> <li>congressional staffers</li> <li>business lobbyists</li> <li>data privacy NGO</li> <li>legal advisors</li> </ol> <p>I want to give each student a one-page <strong>character sheet</strong> to on-board them into the roles (stated above). I hope that each character sheet provides several possible talking points to encourage and guide the debate.</p> <p>Even after I read some materials (below in the “RAG” section), I find that I myself am not a writer of debates. Thus, I shall employ <strong>prompt engineering</strong> to create the bullet-point lists of talking points. The idea of debate roles lends itself well for the prompt engineering tool.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QUBES
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25334/c3vz-yr02
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agile Ethics: AI Governance Debate Case Study

Derek Edward Sollberger
QUBES
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Agile Ethics: AI Governance Debate Case Study

Derek Edward Sollberger
article en

Abstract

<p>I have then been picturing a classroom debate about government regulation in AI. I think that this would appeal to my audience of mostly engineering majors. Over the summer in the AI4ALL summer camp, Dr Steven Kelts led a great ethics debate with the students, and I am hoping to emulate that by partitioning the SML 301 students into 4 roles such as</p> <ol type="1"> <li>congressional staffers</li> <li>business lobbyists</li> <li>data privacy NGO</li> <li>legal advisors</li> </ol> <p>I want to give each student a one-page <strong>character sheet</strong> to on-board them into the roles (stated above). I hope that each character sheet provides several possible talking points to encourage and guide the debate.</p> <p>Even after I read some materials (below in the “RAG” section), I find that I myself am not a writer of debates. Thus, I shall employ <strong>prompt engineering</strong> to create the bullet-point lists of talking points. The idea of debate roles lends itself well for the prompt engineering tool.</p>

QUBES
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.