Agile Ethics: AI Governance Debate Case Study
<p>I have then been picturing a classroom debate about government regulation in AI. I think that this would appeal to my audience of mostly engineering majors. Over the summer in the AI4ALL summer camp, Dr Steven Kelts led a great ethics debate with the students, and I am hoping to emulate that by partitioning the SML 301 students into 4 roles such as</p> <ol type="1"> <li>congressional staffers</li> <li>business lobbyists</li> <li>data privacy NGO</li> <li>legal advisors</li> </ol> <p>I want to give each student a one-page <strong>character sheet</strong> to on-board them into the roles (stated above). I hope that each character sheet provides several possible talking points to encourage and guide the debate.</p> <p>Even after I read some materials (below in the &ldquo;RAG&rdquo; section), I find that I myself am not a writer of debates. Thus, I shall employ <strong>prompt engineering</strong> to create the bullet-point lists of talking points. The idea of debate roles lends itself well for the prompt engineering tool.</p>
Authors
- Derek Edward Sollberger
Institutions
- Princeton University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- QUBES
- Published
- 2026-01-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.25334/c3vz-yr02
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00