Structural damage analysis using finite element model updating enhanced by response surface methodology

Over time, structural damage can manifest due to external loads, underscoring the importance of early identification to mitigate risks and minimize financial and safety concerns. Maintaining an up-to-date finite element model supports informed decision-making throughout a structure's lifecycle, enabling effective risk assessment. Additionally, finite element model updating ensures structural analyses accurately reflect real-world conditions. However, the process of model updating, which involves adjusting FEM parameters to accurately reflect the behavior of the structure, can be time-consuming and challenging, particularly for complex structures. To address this issue, this research investigated the effect of different parameters on Finite Element model updating using statistical methods. In all the controlling factors, two specific ones, the Convergence Index (COI) and the Closeness Index (CI), were employed in 81 numerical experiments. Following the presented model updating technique, these experiments were structured using the central composite design method within a 2D truss framework. ANOVA was then employed to analyze the effect of different variables, and predictive models were developed and verified. To achieve appropriate convergence time and accuracy based on project sensitivity, the models were used to optimize the FEMU performance. Drawing from the findings regarding the CI parameter, implementing a multi-objective optimization strategy has notably elevated its value. Originally hovering between 75 and 85%, it has surged to 97.5%. Through optimizing the FEMU process with the suggested methodologies, pinpointing structural damage becomes more precise, rapid, and cost-effective, consequently diminishing maintenance expenses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30679-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural damage analysis using finite element model updating enhanced by response surface methodology

Sajad Ranjbar, Fereidoon Moghadas Nejad, Mohammad Rahai, Sadegh Mobarhan Zad
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
19.37
article

Structural damage analysis using finite element model updating enhanced by response surface methodology

Sajad Ranjbar, Fereidoon Moghadas Nejad, Mohammad Rahai, Sadegh Mobarhan Zad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Over time, structural damage can manifest due to external loads, underscoring the importance of early identification to mitigate risks and minimize financial and safety concerns. Maintaining an up-to-date finite element model supports informed decision-making throughout a structure's lifecycle, enabling effective risk assessment. Additionally, finite element model updating ensures structural analyses accurately reflect real-world conditions. However, the process of model updating, which involves adjusting FEM parameters to accurately reflect the behavior of the structure, can be time-consuming and challenging, particularly for complex structures. To address this issue, this research investigated the effect of different parameters on Finite Element model updating using statistical methods. In all the controlling factors, two specific ones, the Convergence Index (COI) and the Closeness Index (CI), were employed in 81 numerical experiments. Following the presented model updating technique, these experiments were structured using the central composite design method within a 2D truss framework. ANOVA was then employed to analyze the effect of different variables, and predictive models were developed and verified. To achieve appropriate convergence time and accuracy based on project sensitivity, the models were used to optimize the FEMU performance. Drawing from the findings regarding the CI parameter, implementing a multi-objective optimization strategy has notably elevated its value. Originally hovering between 75 and 85%, it has surged to 97.5%. Through optimizing the FEMU process with the suggested methodologies, pinpointing structural damage becomes more precise, rapid, and cost-effective, consequently diminishing maintenance expenses.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Sharif University of Technology (IR), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
19.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structural damage analysis using finite element model updating enhanced by response surface methodology — Sajad Ranjbar, Fereidoon Moghadas Nejad, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS