Desegregating spaces: The interplay between ecological intergroup contact and <scp>GPS</scp> ‐traced spatial segregation among youth in two <scp>UK</scp> cities

Recent advances in intergroup contact research have drawn on methods from human geography to investigate how segregation shapes, and is shaped by, everyday intergroup experiences. Emerging findings suggest that the phenomena might be reciprocally intertwined, but empirical evidence is limited and mixed. This research tested the reciprocal relationship between everyday intergroup contact and segregation using ecological momentary assessment and GPS-GIS tracking in two segregated UK cities with youths aged 15-17. Study 1 (Belfast; n<sub>participants</sub> = 15; n<sub>interactions</sub> = 115; n<sub>GPS-point</sub> = 633) focused on Catholics-Protestants divisions, and Study 2 (Bradford; n<sub>participants</sub> = 30; n<sub>interactions</sub> = 334; n<sub>GPS-point</sub> = 2868) addressed ethnic segregation among Asian, White, and Black communities. In both studies, youths reported on social interactions throughout 6 days, while their urban mobility in outgroup spaces was tracked. In Belfast, more mixed districts predicted higher anxiety during intergroup interactions, yet, positive intergroup contact was followed by increased visits to outgroup spaces. In Bradford, mixed districts increased the likelihood (but not the quality) of intergroup contact, while the link between positive contact and subsequent outgroup space use was replicated. The findings highlight a virtuous cycle depending on contextual norms by which positive contact and desegregation practices might reinforce each other, arguably demonstrating the potential of intergroup contact for levelling urban divisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70043
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Desegregating spaces: The interplay between ecological intergroup contact and GPS ‐traced spatial segregation among youth in two UK cities

David Manley, Laura K. Taylor, Christoph Daniel Schaefer, Marco Marinucci et al.
British Journal of Social Psychology
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Desegregating spaces: The interplay between ecological intergroup contact and GPS ‐traced spatial segregation among youth in two UK cities

David Manley, Laura K. Taylor, Christoph Daniel Schaefer, Marco Marinucci, Shelley McKeown, Pier‐Luc Dupont
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in intergroup contact research have drawn on methods from human geography to investigate how segregation shapes, and is shaped by, everyday intergroup experiences. Emerging findings suggest that the phenomena might be reciprocally intertwined, but empirical evidence is limited and mixed. This research tested the reciprocal relationship between everyday intergroup contact and segregation using ecological momentary assessment and GPS-GIS tracking in two segregated UK cities with youths aged 15-17. Study 1 (Belfast; n<sub>participants</sub> = 15; n<sub>interactions</sub> = 115; n<sub>GPS-point</sub> = 633) focused on Catholics-Protestants divisions, and Study 2 (Bradford; n<sub>participants</sub> = 30; n<sub>interactions</sub> = 334; n<sub>GPS-point</sub> = 2868) addressed ethnic segregation among Asian, White, and Black communities. In both studies, youths reported on social interactions throughout 6 days, while their urban mobility in outgroup spaces was tracked. In Belfast, more mixed districts predicted higher anxiety during intergroup interactions, yet, positive intergroup contact was followed by increased visits to outgroup spaces. In Bradford, mixed districts increased the likelihood (but not the quality) of intergroup contact, while the link between positive contact and subsequent outgroup space use was replicated. The findings highlight a virtuous cycle depending on contextual norms by which positive contact and desegregation practices might reinforce each other, arguably demonstrating the potential of intergroup contact for levelling urban divisions.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 65(1)
University College Dublin (IE), University of East Anglia (GB), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), University of Bristol (GB), Swansea University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.