The challenge of adopting the health assessment when implementing antenatal and postnatal Group Care: identifying and understanding cross-country modifications and corresponding strategies to enable its adoption

The role of differing perspectives in the adaptation process when implementing Group Care and the challenge for facilitators to align their attitudes, beliefs and skills toward the Group Care model within an individually focused healthcare system, emerged as underlying factors to fully adopt the health assessment. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that, despite the locally context-driven nature of modifications in implementation, it remains valuable to examine them within a cross-country design to identify transferable insights that inform future implementation efforts and implementation science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00851-5
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenge of adopting the health assessment when implementing antenatal and postnatal Group Care: identifying and understanding cross-country modifications and corresponding strategies to enable its adoption

Florence Talrich, Manodj P. Hindori, K Beeckman, Astrid Van Damme et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

The challenge of adopting the health assessment when implementing antenatal and postnatal Group Care: identifying and understanding cross-country modifications and corresponding strategies to enable its adoption

Florence Talrich, Manodj P. Hindori, K Beeckman, Astrid Van Damme, Wiedaad Slemming, Marlies Rijnders, Christine McCourt, Malibongwe Gwele, Jedidia Abanga, Marsha Orgill, Crystal Patil, Matty Crone, Sharon Rising, Ashna Hindori-Mohangoo
article en

Abstract

The role of differing perspectives in the adaptation process when implementing Group Care and the challenge for facilitators to align their attitudes, beliefs and skills toward the Group Care model within an individually focused healthcare system, emerged as underlying factors to fully adopt the health assessment. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that, despite the locally context-driven nature of modifications in implementation, it remains valuable to examine them within a cross-country design to identify transferable insights that inform future implementation efforts and implementation science.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), University of Cape Town (ZA), City, University of London (GB), University of Michigan (US), Maastricht University (NL), Presbyterian University, Ghana (GH), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE), Ghana Health Service (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The challenge of adopting the health assessment when implementing antenatal and postnatal Group Care: identifying and understanding cross-country modifications and corresponding strategies to enable its adoption — Florence Talrich, Manodj P. Hindori, et al. · Implementation Science Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS