Barriers to and facilitators of clinical trial participation in multiple myeloma

1 Key barriers to multiple myeloma clinical trial participation were identified, and country-specific recommendations are provided. 2 Findings will advance the field and can form the basis of a framework that informs the optimal implementation of recommendations. Therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) have advanced; however, disparity in healthcare outcomes remains. Barriers to clinical trial enrollment contribute to this disparity and result in recruiting unrepresentative groups of patients, depriving patients of opportunities to benefit from experimental treatments, and causing incompletion of some trials due to insufficient accrual rates. This study aimed to identify geographic inequalities in clinical trial participation and develop a comprehensive list of barriers (factors preventing participation) to and facilitators (factors enabling improvements) of patient enrollment in MM clinical trials. Geographic data were collected for MM trials registered between 2011 and 2021 to determine the number of trials and recruitment rates in different regions. Of the trials identified, 61% recruited patients from the US; 24%, 14%, and 13% recruited patients from Western Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Asia, respectively. Other geographic regions were less involved in MM clinical trials, highlighting global inequality in MM clinical research. Barriers to and facilitators of patient enrollment in MM trials were identified through a systematic literature review and broadly categorized into 4 domains: clinical (eg, eligibility criteria), patient specific (eg, socioeconomics), physician specific (eg, awareness of trials), and structural (eg, regulatory environment). These domains were presented to stakeholders, who were from various backgrounds and geographic regions, to ascertain which were most relevant to patients with MM globally. Recommendations were identified, with unanimous support from interviewees, and have the most potential for global application. The application of these findings will help overcome the many barriers to enrollment in MM clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Global Hematology
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bglo.2025.100056
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to and facilitators of clinical trial participation in multiple myeloma

Katie Joyner, Jack Lewis, Alicia O’Neill, Elise Gamertsfelder et al.
Blood Global Hematology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Barriers to and facilitators of clinical trial participation in multiple myeloma

Katie Joyner, Jack Lewis, Alicia O’Neill, Elise Gamertsfelder, Yelak Biru, Saba Ajwat Ul-Hasan, Federica Mirto, Martin Kaiser, Cynthia Chmielewski
article en

Abstract

1 Key barriers to multiple myeloma clinical trial participation were identified, and country-specific recommendations are provided. 2 Findings will advance the field and can form the basis of a framework that informs the optimal implementation of recommendations. Therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) have advanced; however, disparity in healthcare outcomes remains. Barriers to clinical trial enrollment contribute to this disparity and result in recruiting unrepresentative groups of patients, depriving patients of opportunities to benefit from experimental treatments, and causing incompletion of some trials due to insufficient accrual rates. This study aimed to identify geographic inequalities in clinical trial participation and develop a comprehensive list of barriers (factors preventing participation) to and facilitators (factors enabling improvements) of patient enrollment in MM clinical trials. Geographic data were collected for MM trials registered between 2011 and 2021 to determine the number of trials and recruitment rates in different regions. Of the trials identified, 61% recruited patients from the US; 24%, 14%, and 13% recruited patients from Western Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Asia, respectively. Other geographic regions were less involved in MM clinical trials, highlighting global inequality in MM clinical research. Barriers to and facilitators of patient enrollment in MM trials were identified through a systematic literature review and broadly categorized into 4 domains: clinical (eg, eligibility criteria), patient specific (eg, socioeconomics), physician specific (eg, awareness of trials), and structural (eg, regulatory environment). These domains were presented to stakeholders, who were from various backgrounds and geographic regions, to ascertain which were most relevant to patients with MM globally. Recommendations were identified, with unanimous support from interviewees, and have the most potential for global application. The application of these findings will help overcome the many barriers to enrollment in MM clinical trials.

Blood Global HematologyVol. 2(1)
Institute of Cancer Research (GB), State University of Medan (ID), West Lothian Council (GB), South Jordan Health Center (US), GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US), European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients Associations (BE), International Myeloma Foundation (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.