Redefining Value: Eco‐Efficiency and Life Cycle Management for Sustainable Performance of the Fertilizer Industry

ABSTRACT Cost minimization and reducing impacts have become essential business priorities in today's rapidly evolving regulatory environment. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the emerging mechanisms that helps drive this momentum and underscores the importance of sustainable practices in achieving both environmental and economic objectives. The manufacturing industry must assess its sustainable performance to ensure long‐term viability. This study conducts a Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Eco‐Efficiency (EE) analysis for four Fertilizer Industries (FIs) engaged in Urea and NPK fertilizer manufacturing in emerging markets. A quantitative study, supplemented by qualitative validation, utilizes ISO 14040/44 standards, integrating the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD DN) and the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) databases for comprehensive cost analysis. Key cost drivers, including raw material usage, energy consumption, labor, and maintenance, are examined to assess their economic impacts during fertilizer production. The EE analysis is integrated with cost‐environmental impacts, emphasizing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and resource depletion metrics. The findings show that raw materials and electricity dominate costs and carbon footprints; raw inputs account for more than 60% of production expenses and are the primary source of CO 2 emissions and resource depletion. Scenario mapping shows that more innovative use of resources, greener feedstocks, and energy‐saving measures can slash costs and emissions, giving the best EE score for FI investing in cleaner power and optimizing their material mix. The study can facilitate FIs' compliance with emerging environmental regulations, minimize operational costs, and enhance sustainable performance, ensuring both economic and ecological resilience. The study findings will help policymakers and decision‐makers by providing a clear view of the most cost‐effective, low‐carbon strategies for this hard‐to‐abate sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70374
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Value: Eco‐Efficiency and Life Cycle Management for Sustainable Performance of the Fertilizer Industry

Sachin Kumar Mangla, Vidyadhar V. Gedam, Abhinav Katiyar
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Redefining Value: Eco‐Efficiency and Life Cycle Management for Sustainable Performance of the Fertilizer Industry

Sachin Kumar Mangla, Vidyadhar V. Gedam, Abhinav Katiyar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cost minimization and reducing impacts have become essential business priorities in today's rapidly evolving regulatory environment. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the emerging mechanisms that helps drive this momentum and underscores the importance of sustainable practices in achieving both environmental and economic objectives. The manufacturing industry must assess its sustainable performance to ensure long‐term viability. This study conducts a Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Eco‐Efficiency (EE) analysis for four Fertilizer Industries (FIs) engaged in Urea and NPK fertilizer manufacturing in emerging markets. A quantitative study, supplemented by qualitative validation, utilizes ISO 14040/44 standards, integrating the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD DN) and the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) databases for comprehensive cost analysis. Key cost drivers, including raw material usage, energy consumption, labor, and maintenance, are examined to assess their economic impacts during fertilizer production. The EE analysis is integrated with cost‐environmental impacts, emphasizing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and resource depletion metrics. The findings show that raw materials and electricity dominate costs and carbon footprints; raw inputs account for more than 60% of production expenses and are the primary source of CO 2 emissions and resource depletion. Scenario mapping shows that more innovative use of resources, greener feedstocks, and energy‐saving measures can slash costs and emissions, giving the best EE score for FI investing in cleaner power and optimizing their material mix. The study can facilitate FIs' compliance with emerging environmental regulations, minimize operational costs, and enhance sustainable performance, ensuring both economic and ecological resilience. The study findings will help policymakers and decision‐makers by providing a clear view of the most cost‐effective, low‐carbon strategies for this hard‐to‐abate sector.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Fore School of Management (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.