Eurojust's Resource Paradox: Mandate-Resource Misalignment in Digital Judicial Cooperation

The Eurojust Single Programming Document (SPD) 2026–2028 articulates a forward-leaning vision for the agency as a central, digital, and globally connected hub for judicial cooperation. It simultaneously reveals a widening gap between an expanding mandate and constrained resources [1]. Drawing on the SPD's workload projections, budgetary trajectory, and programmatic priorities, this article argues that Eurojust's strategy is appropriately diagnostic but operationally reactive, primarily because it is tethered to demand-driven caseloads and capped by the current Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF). The result is a "resource paradox": new tasks without commensurate funding, a ceiling on efficiency gains, and negative priorities that directly affect complex case support, cybersecurity posture, external cooperation, and the integrity of core digital initiatives. The article examines the risks embedded in Eurojust's digitalization program (notably CMS integration, JUDEX, and interoperability) and in expanded third-country cooperation, and proposes actionable reforms: (i) treat the SPD as an investment-grade business case; (ii) establish a realistic resource baseline in the forthcoming Eurojust Regulation revision; (iii) fund cybersecurity to the level of systemic risk; and (iv) embed robust safeguards for data protection, fundamental rights, and accountability across interoperable systems and external partnerships.