Regulations for Clinical Supervision in Social Work: Analysis of State Statutes and Clinical License Applicants

Abstract This study aims to review national guidelines and best practice standards for how state boards should regulate clinical supervision in social work. It also aims to examine variations in state rules regarding clinical supervision regulations and categorize states by the strength of their regulation of clinical supervision. The analysis of the Model Practice Act and Best Supervision Standards provides the following four domains for regulating clinical supervision: (1) supervisor qualifications, (2) supervision plans, (3) documentation and reporting, and (4) supervision timeframe and hours. The analysis of state regulatory rules, combined with data from clinical license applicants, indicates that seven states —representing approximately 21% of clinical license applicants nationwide —had weaker regulation, lacking rules in all or most regulatory domains in their social work statutes. In contrast, 23 states—representing approximately 24% of license applicants nationwide—had stronger regulation of clinical supervision, having rules in all four regulatory domains. The findings suggest that further research is necessary to investigate how the absence of regulatory rules affects the quality of clinical supervision, the clinical workforce, and public safety measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Social Work Journal
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-025-01025-5
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulations for Clinical Supervision in Social Work: Analysis of State Statutes and Clinical License Applicants

Jeounghee Kim, Jiyoon Park
Clinical Social Work Journal
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Regulations for Clinical Supervision in Social Work: Analysis of State Statutes and Clinical License Applicants

Jeounghee Kim, Jiyoon Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to review national guidelines and best practice standards for how state boards should regulate clinical supervision in social work. It also aims to examine variations in state rules regarding clinical supervision regulations and categorize states by the strength of their regulation of clinical supervision. The analysis of the Model Practice Act and Best Supervision Standards provides the following four domains for regulating clinical supervision: (1) supervisor qualifications, (2) supervision plans, (3) documentation and reporting, and (4) supervision timeframe and hours. The analysis of state regulatory rules, combined with data from clinical license applicants, indicates that seven states —representing approximately 21% of clinical license applicants nationwide —had weaker regulation, lacking rules in all or most regulatory domains in their social work statutes. In contrast, 23 states—representing approximately 24% of license applicants nationwide—had stronger regulation of clinical supervision, having rules in all four regulatory domains. The findings suggest that further research is necessary to investigate how the absence of regulatory rules affects the quality of clinical supervision, the clinical workforce, and public safety measures.

Clinical Social Work Journal
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.