Prenatal Chlamydia Screening Guidelines: Awareness, Adoption, and Acceptability

Background: Chlamydia infections during pregnancy are associated with adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, perinatal death, and miscarriage. Many professional organizations have evidence-based guidelines recommending chlamydia screening during pregnancy, but little is known regarding the factors influencing the adoption of these guidelines into practice. This study assessed the awareness, adoption, and acceptability of prenatal chlamydia screening guidelines among physicians. Methods: Prenatal providers in the United States (MD/DO; n = 201) were recruited via an online survey platform. Items assessed provider awareness about prenatal chlamydia and STI screening guidelines, current practice behaviors, and risk factors considered when screening pregnant patients for STIs. Guideline characteristics including acceptability, feasibility, relative advantage, and evidence source were assessed. Descriptive and bivariate comparisons were analyzed using SAS v9.4. Results: Over 12% of providers were unaware of prenatal STI screening recommendations from their professional organizations, and almost 8% were unaware of chlamydia screening guidelines. Most providers reported using the prenatal chlamydia screening guideline from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (70%). Those selecting this guideline were significantly more likely to describe this guideline as clear ( P = 0.004) and report that guideline source was important ( P = 0.006) compared to other organization guidelines. Conclusions: Awareness of professional organization guidelines about prenatal chlamydia screening guidelines was high among providers. However, women are not screened adequately during their pregnancies suggesting that there are other factors contributing to the underutilization of screening. Future studies should focus on how these organizations can improve guideline dissemination to increase implementation of chlamydia screening during pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001533
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Chlamydia Screening Guidelines: Awareness, Adoption, and Acceptability

Malinee Neelamegam, Amanda Brosnan, Ashlyn Kinard, BS Tiffany Lemuz et al.
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Prenatal Chlamydia Screening Guidelines: Awareness, Adoption, and Acceptability

Malinee Neelamegam, Amanda Brosnan, Ashlyn Kinard, BS Tiffany Lemuz, Kaeli Johnson, Stacey B. Griner
article en

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia infections during pregnancy are associated with adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, perinatal death, and miscarriage. Many professional organizations have evidence-based guidelines recommending chlamydia screening during pregnancy, but little is known regarding the factors influencing the adoption of these guidelines into practice. This study assessed the awareness, adoption, and acceptability of prenatal chlamydia screening guidelines among physicians. Methods: Prenatal providers in the United States (MD/DO; n = 201) were recruited via an online survey platform. Items assessed provider awareness about prenatal chlamydia and STI screening guidelines, current practice behaviors, and risk factors considered when screening pregnant patients for STIs. Guideline characteristics including acceptability, feasibility, relative advantage, and evidence source were assessed. Descriptive and bivariate comparisons were analyzed using SAS v9.4. Results: Over 12% of providers were unaware of prenatal STI screening recommendations from their professional organizations, and almost 8% were unaware of chlamydia screening guidelines. Most providers reported using the prenatal chlamydia screening guideline from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (70%). Those selecting this guideline were significantly more likely to describe this guideline as clear ( P = 0.004) and report that guideline source was important ( P = 0.006) compared to other organization guidelines. Conclusions: Awareness of professional organization guidelines about prenatal chlamydia screening guidelines was high among providers. However, women are not screened adequately during their pregnancies suggesting that there are other factors contributing to the underutilization of screening. Future studies should focus on how these organizations can improve guideline dissemination to increase implementation of chlamydia screening during pregnancy.

Infectious Diseases in Clinical PracticeVol. 34(2)
University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Texas College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.