Graduate school choice: how STEM students in the USA decide where to enroll

There is a dearth of research on which factors students consider when selecting among STEM graduate programs. This is an important knowledge gap because of the value of graduate STEM education to individuals and society. We leverage interview data collected in 2022 from rising seniors after they completed summer undergraduate research programs at different US universities and again in 2023 when they were in their first semester of graduate school (n = 12). We examine how first-semester STEM graduate students from across the US conducted their search and made choices about where to enroll. Qualitative analysis revealed that students considered potential faculty advisor research and mentorship, program characteristics (e.g., reputation), funding packages, and geography, but weighed those differently during the search vs. choice phases. Geography and program reputation mattered more during the search phase than choice phase. Faculty advisors were important in both phases with the potential for high-quality mentorship becoming more important during the choice phase. Preferences for diversity cross-cut the considerations in both phases, relating to geography (e.g., potential to experience racism in a place), program characteristics (e.g., gender diversity of faculty), and advisor demographics. Students took a holistic view toward funding, weighing cost of living, type of funding, and other benefits in addition to the amount. They did not always take their offer with the highest funding amount, although the provision of a sufficient funding package was essential. Mentorship from summer undergraduate research mentors was critical during the search phase but absent during the choice phase. In terms of potential implications, graduate programs should partner with undergraduate research programs to intentionally build bridges between faculty and prospective applicants. In addition to providing adequate funding packages, graduate programs should create opportunities for students to connect with faculty as part of their recruitment strategy, as this is critical to students’ choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00585-9
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graduate school choice: how STEM students in the USA decide where to enroll

Yolanda Chavez, Danielle X. Morales, Sara E. Grineski, Timothy W. Collins et al.
International Journal of STEM Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Graduate school choice: how STEM students in the USA decide where to enroll

Yolanda Chavez, Danielle X. Morales, Sara E. Grineski, Timothy W. Collins, Callie Lynne Avondet
article en

Abstract

There is a dearth of research on which factors students consider when selecting among STEM graduate programs. This is an important knowledge gap because of the value of graduate STEM education to individuals and society. We leverage interview data collected in 2022 from rising seniors after they completed summer undergraduate research programs at different US universities and again in 2023 when they were in their first semester of graduate school (n = 12). We examine how first-semester STEM graduate students from across the US conducted their search and made choices about where to enroll. Qualitative analysis revealed that students considered potential faculty advisor research and mentorship, program characteristics (e.g., reputation), funding packages, and geography, but weighed those differently during the search vs. choice phases. Geography and program reputation mattered more during the search phase than choice phase. Faculty advisors were important in both phases with the potential for high-quality mentorship becoming more important during the choice phase. Preferences for diversity cross-cut the considerations in both phases, relating to geography (e.g., potential to experience racism in a place), program characteristics (e.g., gender diversity of faculty), and advisor demographics. Students took a holistic view toward funding, weighing cost of living, type of funding, and other benefits in addition to the amount. They did not always take their offer with the highest funding amount, although the provision of a sufficient funding package was essential. Mentorship from summer undergraduate research mentors was critical during the search phase but absent during the choice phase. In terms of potential implications, graduate programs should partner with undergraduate research programs to intentionally build bridges between faculty and prospective applicants. In addition to providing adequate funding packages, graduate programs should create opportunities for students to connect with faculty as part of their recruitment strategy, as this is critical to students’ choices.

International Journal of STEM EducationVol. 13(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Utah (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.