EOAD‐Signature Atrophy Predicts Progression to Dementia in Patients with Early‐onset MCI due to Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract Background Prognostic risk stratification for patients at the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) would allow professionals and loved ones to make better‐informed medical and life planning decisions. While research including our own (Bakkour, Morris, Dickerson, 2009) has demonstrated the prognostic value of MRI‐based measures of brain structure in late‐onset amnestic AD, its utility for predicting progression to dementia in EOAD remains unclear. Here, we measured the magnitude of cortical atrophy within our recently described EOAD signature regions (Touroutoglou et al. 2023) in patients with EOAD at the MCI stage ( N = 130) recruited in LEADS. The main goal of the study was to evaluate the utility of this measure as a predictor of time to subsequent progression to dementia. Our second goal was to examine the independent or synergistic contributions of EOAD signature of atrophy and standard clinical severity measures used in clinical trials. Method For each patient, we measured the time between baseline visit and subsequent visit at which progression to mild dementia was documented or last observation. Baseline cortical atrophy was measured as W ‐scores (i.e., Z ‐scores adjusted for age and sex relative to a sample of healthy controls) in the EOAD signature. Baseline clinical severity was quantified with the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum‐of‐Boxes scores (CDR‐SB). Simple and multivariable Cox regression models examined the relationship between atrophy in EOAD signature, baseline CDR‐SB, and the likelihood of progression to dementia. Result Greater baseline atrophy in the EOAD signature predicted higher risk of progression to dementia (hazard ratio = 1.2, 95% CI 1.1‐1.3) and provided additive value to the CDR‐SB (hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% CI:1.7‐2.8) in predicting progression. Conclusion These findings point to the role of EOAD MRI signature as an imaging biomarker to guide prognostication for patients with EOAD and their families and to inform the design of clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105039
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EOAD‐Signature Atrophy Predicts Progression to Dementia in Patients with Early‐onset MCI due to Alzheimer's Disease

Alexandra Touroutoglou, Michael Brickhouse, Renaud La Joie, Thiago Paranhos et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

EOAD‐Signature Atrophy Predicts Progression to Dementia in Patients with Early‐onset MCI due to Alzheimer's Disease

Alexandra Touroutoglou, Michael Brickhouse, Renaud La Joie, Thiago Paranhos, Jeffrey L. Dage, Kelly Nudelman, Yuta Katsumi, Ani Eloyan, Ryan Eckbo, Alexander Zaitsev, M. Carrillo, Anna Du, Brad C. Dickerson, Liana G. Apostolova, Gil D. Rabinovici, Tatiana M. Foroud
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prognostic risk stratification for patients at the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) would allow professionals and loved ones to make better‐informed medical and life planning decisions. While research including our own (Bakkour, Morris, Dickerson, 2009) has demonstrated the prognostic value of MRI‐based measures of brain structure in late‐onset amnestic AD, its utility for predicting progression to dementia in EOAD remains unclear. Here, we measured the magnitude of cortical atrophy within our recently described EOAD signature regions (Touroutoglou et al. 2023) in patients with EOAD at the MCI stage ( N = 130) recruited in LEADS. The main goal of the study was to evaluate the utility of this measure as a predictor of time to subsequent progression to dementia. Our second goal was to examine the independent or synergistic contributions of EOAD signature of atrophy and standard clinical severity measures used in clinical trials. Method For each patient, we measured the time between baseline visit and subsequent visit at which progression to mild dementia was documented or last observation. Baseline cortical atrophy was measured as W ‐scores (i.e., Z ‐scores adjusted for age and sex relative to a sample of healthy controls) in the EOAD signature. Baseline clinical severity was quantified with the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum‐of‐Boxes scores (CDR‐SB). Simple and multivariable Cox regression models examined the relationship between atrophy in EOAD signature, baseline CDR‐SB, and the likelihood of progression to dementia. Result Greater baseline atrophy in the EOAD signature predicted higher risk of progression to dementia (hazard ratio = 1.2, 95% CI 1.1‐1.3) and provided additive value to the CDR‐SB (hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% CI:1.7‐2.8) in predicting progression. Conclusion These findings point to the role of EOAD MRI signature as an imaging biomarker to guide prognostication for patients with EOAD and their families and to inform the design of clinical trials.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Brown University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.