Genesis of the Paleoproterozoic Heiyuting Fe deposit in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton: Constraints from geochronology and geochemistry

• The Heiyuting Fe deposit in the JLJB formed at 1848 ± 5 Ma. • Fe derived from Li’eryu Formation and 2.2–2.1 Ga volcanism • Partial melting promoted migmatization, which subsequently led to iron enrichment. • Regional metamorphism-anatexis activity led to polymetallic mineralization in JLJB. Paleoproterozoic metamorphic rock series is widely distributed and hosts several iron deposits. The Heiyuting iron (Fe) deposit is hosted by typical Paleoproterozoic leptite of the Li’eryu Formation and represents a key example for constraining the mineralization process of Paleoproterozoic iron deposits within the Liaohe Group. This type of deposit has great exploration potential, but the precise timing of iron mineralization, the sources of ore-forming materials, and iron mineralization processes remain unclear. We conducted zircon and monazite U-Pb geochronology together with monazite electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) to constrain iron mineralization. Zircon cores from the migmatitic granite yield an age of 2174 ± 23 Ma, representing protolith formation, whereas the rims yield 1892 ± 14 Ma, consistent with ∼ 1900 Ma granulite-facies metamorphism. Monazite grains associated with magnetite yielded an age of 1848 ± 5 Ma, constraining Fe mineralization and coinciding with regional partial melting (1870–1840 Ma). Monazites observed under back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging show embayed structures and concentric coronas composed of apatite, allanite, and epidote. Based on the major-, trace-, and REE-element compositions of monazite, a metamorphic-hydrothermal origin is suggested. We propose that the apatite-allanite-epidote coronas developed on early-formed monazite through disequilibrium reactions with F-Ca-Fe-Si-Al-rich fluids during the retrograde metamorphic stage. The Li’eryu Formation and the 2.2–2.1 Ga magmatism provided the primary sources of iron. The iron was subsequently concentrated by hydrothermal activity during late metamorphism-anatexis at ∼ 1850 Ma. Our results refine the age, source, and mechanisms of iron mineralization in the Heiyuting Fe deposit, provide geochronological and geochemical constraints for similar deposits, and highlight the role of regional metamorphism-anatexis in polymetallic enrichment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107107
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genesis of the Paleoproterozoic Heiyuting Fe deposit in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton: Constraints from geochronology and geochemistry

Lixing Li, Xiuling Zhao, Xiaohui Wang, Yu-Bo Ma et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Genesis of the Paleoproterozoic Heiyuting Fe deposit in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton: Constraints from geochronology and geochemistry

Lixing Li, Xiuling Zhao, Xiaohui Wang, Yu-Bo Ma, Hou-Min Li, Yang Dai, Xuan Wu, Yi Wang, Xi-Long Liu, Xiao-Yang Fan
article en

Abstract

• The Heiyuting Fe deposit in the JLJB formed at 1848 ± 5 Ma. • Fe derived from Li’eryu Formation and 2.2–2.1 Ga volcanism • Partial melting promoted migmatization, which subsequently led to iron enrichment. • Regional metamorphism-anatexis activity led to polymetallic mineralization in JLJB. Paleoproterozoic metamorphic rock series is widely distributed and hosts several iron deposits. The Heiyuting iron (Fe) deposit is hosted by typical Paleoproterozoic leptite of the Li’eryu Formation and represents a key example for constraining the mineralization process of Paleoproterozoic iron deposits within the Liaohe Group. This type of deposit has great exploration potential, but the precise timing of iron mineralization, the sources of ore-forming materials, and iron mineralization processes remain unclear. We conducted zircon and monazite U-Pb geochronology together with monazite electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) to constrain iron mineralization. Zircon cores from the migmatitic granite yield an age of 2174 ± 23 Ma, representing protolith formation, whereas the rims yield 1892 ± 14 Ma, consistent with ∼ 1900 Ma granulite-facies metamorphism. Monazite grains associated with magnetite yielded an age of 1848 ± 5 Ma, constraining Fe mineralization and coinciding with regional partial melting (1870–1840 Ma). Monazites observed under back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging show embayed structures and concentric coronas composed of apatite, allanite, and epidote. Based on the major-, trace-, and REE-element compositions of monazite, a metamorphic-hydrothermal origin is suggested. We propose that the apatite-allanite-epidote coronas developed on early-formed monazite through disequilibrium reactions with F-Ca-Fe-Si-Al-rich fluids during the retrograde metamorphic stage. The Li’eryu Formation and the 2.2–2.1 Ga magmatism provided the primary sources of iron. The iron was subsequently concentrated by hydrothermal activity during late metamorphism-anatexis at ∼ 1850 Ma. Our results refine the age, source, and mechanisms of iron mineralization in the Heiyuting Fe deposit, provide geochronological and geochemical constraints for similar deposits, and highlight the role of regional metamorphism-anatexis in polymetallic enrichment.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 188
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Inner Mongolia Electric Power Survey & Design Institute (China) (CN), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Meteorological Bureau (CN), Gansu Coalfield Geology Bureau (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.