Assessing mechanisms of intrinsic vulnerability in sharks occupying different marine environments

Abstract The status of many shark species worldwide is concerning due to a combination of their life-history traits and widespread exposure to threats, especially fishing. However, the intrinsic vulnerability of species differ given that life-history traits vary with environmental conditions. Here, we aim to assess the links between sharks’ reproductive strategy, maximum depth recorded, and environment occupied (shelf, deepwater and pelagic) to investigate the varying levels of intrinsic vulnerability of different shark species. We find that shelf habitats are dominated by placental viviparous species that rarely occupy other environments. In contrast, oviparous species are found in both shelf and deep-sea habitats but are absent from pelagic environments due to a lack of substrate for egg deposition. Importantly, oviparous species reveal a significantly lower maximum size, size at birth, size at maturity as well as continuous reproduction, all of which are indicators of relatively high productivity and thus lower intrinsic vulnerability. In comparison, placental viviparous species reveal a larger maximum size, size at birth, size at maturity as well as annual or biennial reproduction. These life-history traits are indicative of lower productivity and thus higher intrinsic vulnerability of this dominant species group in shelf habitats where fishing mortality is known to be high. In consequence, placental viviparous species reveal higher proportion of species listed as threatened (VU, EN, CR) in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List compared to oviparous species. However, threats to deep-sea oviparous as well as to aplacental and lecithotrophic viviparous species (which are also abundant in deeper waters) are likely to increase in future due to the expansion of fisheries into open ocean and deeper waters. Although key life-history traits of deep-sea oviparous shark species are indicative of relatively higher productivity, these species have evolved under lower levels of primary productivity and predation risk characteristic of deeper waters. Slower growth and low natural mortality in deep sea oviparous species mean that the risk of population depletion is still high when mortality levels are elevated. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of adopting precautionary and proactive strategies for sharks inhabiting deep-water environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03216-5
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing mechanisms of intrinsic vulnerability in sharks occupying different marine environments

Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Natalie Dowling, Sushmita Mukherji, Nils C. Krueck
Biodiversity and Conservation
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
article

Assessing mechanisms of intrinsic vulnerability in sharks occupying different marine environments

Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Natalie Dowling, Sushmita Mukherji, Nils C. Krueck
article en

Abstract

Abstract The status of many shark species worldwide is concerning due to a combination of their life-history traits and widespread exposure to threats, especially fishing. However, the intrinsic vulnerability of species differ given that life-history traits vary with environmental conditions. Here, we aim to assess the links between sharks’ reproductive strategy, maximum depth recorded, and environment occupied (shelf, deepwater and pelagic) to investigate the varying levels of intrinsic vulnerability of different shark species. We find that shelf habitats are dominated by placental viviparous species that rarely occupy other environments. In contrast, oviparous species are found in both shelf and deep-sea habitats but are absent from pelagic environments due to a lack of substrate for egg deposition. Importantly, oviparous species reveal a significantly lower maximum size, size at birth, size at maturity as well as continuous reproduction, all of which are indicators of relatively high productivity and thus lower intrinsic vulnerability. In comparison, placental viviparous species reveal a larger maximum size, size at birth, size at maturity as well as annual or biennial reproduction. These life-history traits are indicative of lower productivity and thus higher intrinsic vulnerability of this dominant species group in shelf habitats where fishing mortality is known to be high. In consequence, placental viviparous species reveal higher proportion of species listed as threatened (VU, EN, CR) in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List compared to oviparous species. However, threats to deep-sea oviparous as well as to aplacental and lecithotrophic viviparous species (which are also abundant in deeper waters) are likely to increase in future due to the expansion of fisheries into open ocean and deeper waters. Although key life-history traits of deep-sea oviparous shark species are indicative of relatively higher productivity, these species have evolved under lower levels of primary productivity and predation risk characteristic of deeper waters. Slower growth and low natural mortality in deep sea oviparous species mean that the risk of population depletion is still high when mortality levels are elevated. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of adopting precautionary and proactive strategies for sharks inhabiting deep-water environments.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 35(1)
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of Tasmania (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, University of Tasmania
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.