Harmonizing Vietnam's Green Finance Policy with International Standards: A Case Study of the Green Bond Market

Abstract; This study aims to assess the degree of harmonization between Vietnam's legal framework for green bonds, specifically Decree 08/2022/ND-CP, and the International Capital Market Association's (ICMA) Green Bond Principles (GBP), thereby identifying potential barriers to attracting international investment. Using a qualitative research method, through document analysis and legal comparison, the paper systematically compares Vietnam's regulations against the four core components of the GBP: use of proceeds, process for project evaluation and selection, management of proceeds, and reporting. The findings reveal that while there are foundational structural similarities, Vietnam's legal framework has significant gaps. Specifically, the regulations lack detailed technical screening criteria for the green project taxonomy, requirements for transparency in the project selection process, and most notably, the absence of mandatory requirements for quantitative impact reporting and the role of independent third-party verification. These shortcomings are identified as serious barriers that reduce credibility and limit access to large-scale international capital flows. Therefore, the study offers critical practical implications by providing specific policy recommendations for Vietnamese policymakers to refine the legal framework, enhance its compatibility with international standards, and ultimately unlock crucial capital for the nation's green growth objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18170841
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonizing Vietnam's Green Finance Policy with International Standards: A Case Study of the Green Bond Market

Huy Hao Nguyen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Harmonizing Vietnam's Green Finance Policy with International Standards: A Case Study of the Green Bond Market

Huy Hao Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Abstract; This study aims to assess the degree of harmonization between Vietnam's legal framework for green bonds, specifically Decree 08/2022/ND-CP, and the International Capital Market Association's (ICMA) Green Bond Principles (GBP), thereby identifying potential barriers to attracting international investment. Using a qualitative research method, through document analysis and legal comparison, the paper systematically compares Vietnam's regulations against the four core components of the GBP: use of proceeds, process for project evaluation and selection, management of proceeds, and reporting. The findings reveal that while there are foundational structural similarities, Vietnam's legal framework has significant gaps. Specifically, the regulations lack detailed technical screening criteria for the green project taxonomy, requirements for transparency in the project selection process, and most notably, the absence of mandatory requirements for quantitative impact reporting and the role of independent third-party verification. These shortcomings are identified as serious barriers that reduce credibility and limit access to large-scale international capital flows. Therefore, the study offers critical practical implications by providing specific policy recommendations for Vietnamese policymakers to refine the legal framework, enhance its compatibility with international standards, and ultimately unlock crucial capital for the nation's green growth objectives.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Trung Vuong University (VN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.