Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of the Sit Test as a Screening Test for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dogs

Diagnosis of cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is primarily through physical examination, imaging, and intra-articular assessment. Assessment of sit position where affected dogs abduct and extend the stifle to reduce discomfort has been proposed to aid diagnosis but not evaluated as a diagnostic test. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between sit position and CCLR and assess the sit test as a diagnostic tool.Dogs with CCLR or hip dysplasia (HD) diagnosis were prospectively recruited and allocated to affected (CCLR) and unaffected (HD and normal stifles) groups. Dogs were recorded sitting and videos reviewed by three European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) diplomates and three ECVS residents. Sit position was graded normal, abnormal, equivocal, or inconclusive. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were evaluated.Eighty-three dogs (56 affected, 70 unaffected limbs) met inclusion criteria. The sit test demonstrated 61.5% sensitivity, 81.0% specificity, 71.6% PPV, 73.0% NPV, and 72.5% accuracy for CCLR diagnosis. Moderate interobserver agreement was found (κ = 0.536, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of dogs with the CCLR, 72.5% were correctly identified; however, 27.0% of dogs with a negative sit test were affected by CCLR.The sit test offers a screening test for CCLR in conscious dogs with greater sensitivity and similar specificity to cranial draw and tibial compression tests. It may be a valuable addition in CCLR diagnosis, particularly for conscious remote evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2775-4967
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of the Sit Test as a Screening Test for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dogs

Emma Deards, Kevin Parsons, Catherine Tindale, Eithne Comerford et al.
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
article

Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of the Sit Test as a Screening Test for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dogs

Emma Deards, Kevin Parsons, Catherine Tindale, Eithne Comerford, Grace L. Edmunds, Kate Whybrow, Aaron Lutchman, Sorrel J. Langley-Hobbs
article en

Abstract

Diagnosis of cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is primarily through physical examination, imaging, and intra-articular assessment. Assessment of sit position where affected dogs abduct and extend the stifle to reduce discomfort has been proposed to aid diagnosis but not evaluated as a diagnostic test. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between sit position and CCLR and assess the sit test as a diagnostic tool.Dogs with CCLR or hip dysplasia (HD) diagnosis were prospectively recruited and allocated to affected (CCLR) and unaffected (HD and normal stifles) groups. Dogs were recorded sitting and videos reviewed by three European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) diplomates and three ECVS residents. Sit position was graded normal, abnormal, equivocal, or inconclusive. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were evaluated.Eighty-three dogs (56 affected, 70 unaffected limbs) met inclusion criteria. The sit test demonstrated 61.5% sensitivity, 81.0% specificity, 71.6% PPV, 73.0% NPV, and 72.5% accuracy for CCLR diagnosis. Moderate interobserver agreement was found (κ = 0.536, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of dogs with the CCLR, 72.5% were correctly identified; however, 27.0% of dogs with a negative sit test were affected by CCLR.The sit test offers a screening test for CCLR in conscious dogs with greater sensitivity and similar specificity to cranial draw and tibial compression tests. It may be a valuable addition in CCLR diagnosis, particularly for conscious remote evaluation.

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
University of Liverpool (GB), Royal Liverpool University Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.