Engaging HR managers with the sustainable development goals: toward common-good HRM

Purpose The concept of common-good HRM emerged in 2020. Through a review of the literature on the subject, this study shows that empirical research is still sparse and several fundamental questions remain unanswered, thus prompting further investigation. The aim of this study is to answer the following research questions: What are the key common-good HRM practices? What are the antecedents of common-good HRM? What are the outcomes of common-good HRM? Design/methodology/approach This study addresses the above questions by qualitatively analyzing interviews with 11 Polish HR managers. Findings The results indicate key common-good practices such as the development of HR potential, facilitating employees' activism, offering decent and meaningful work, promoting diversity and inclusion and fostering employees' well-being. Additionally, this study identified several antecedents of common-good HRM: social pressure, regulatory support, culture and role models. The outcomes are categorized into organizational (e.g. reputation), employee-related (e.g. motivation) and external stakeholder-related (e.g. quality of collaboration) results. Originality/value This study contributes to the understanding of the emerging common-good HRM concept. It may act as a useful resource for future empirical research, whose aim can be developing and validating a scale for measuring the level of implementation of common-good HRM in a company. It also provides guidelines on possible variables that may be tested as antecedents and outcomes of common-good HRM in future quantitative research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Review
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2024-1075
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging HR managers with the sustainable development goals: toward common-good HRM

Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej
Personnel Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Engaging HR managers with the sustainable development goals: toward common-good HRM

Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej
article en

Abstract

Purpose The concept of common-good HRM emerged in 2020. Through a review of the literature on the subject, this study shows that empirical research is still sparse and several fundamental questions remain unanswered, thus prompting further investigation. The aim of this study is to answer the following research questions: What are the key common-good HRM practices? What are the antecedents of common-good HRM? What are the outcomes of common-good HRM? Design/methodology/approach This study addresses the above questions by qualitatively analyzing interviews with 11 Polish HR managers. Findings The results indicate key common-good practices such as the development of HR potential, facilitating employees' activism, offering decent and meaningful work, promoting diversity and inclusion and fostering employees' well-being. Additionally, this study identified several antecedents of common-good HRM: social pressure, regulatory support, culture and role models. The outcomes are categorized into organizational (e.g. reputation), employee-related (e.g. motivation) and external stakeholder-related (e.g. quality of collaboration) results. Originality/value This study contributes to the understanding of the emerging common-good HRM concept. It may act as a useful resource for future empirical research, whose aim can be developing and validating a scale for measuring the level of implementation of common-good HRM in a company. It also provides guidelines on possible variables that may be tested as antecedents and outcomes of common-good HRM in future quantitative research.

Personnel Review
Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.