Advances in forecasting realized volatility: a review of methodologies

Abstract Over the past decade, volatility modeling has gained increasing importance in quantitative finance, significantly influencing risk management, investment strategies, and policymaking. Traditionally, academic research has emphasized linear models for forecasting realized volatility. However, advances in computational power have enabled the development of more sophisticated approaches, including machine and deep learning models. Despite these advancements, no comprehensive survey currently compares traditional linear methods with newer models in the context of realized volatility forecasting. This survey addresses that gap by analyzing all models used to forecast realized volatility in academic literature from 2000 to the first half of 2024. It highlights key academic contributions and examines the empirical characteristics of realized volatility. Our findings indicate that the top-performing hybrid convolutional neural network and long short-term memory model surpasses other models in forecasting accuracy. These results highlight the ability of such models to capture a broader range of factors driving realized volatility, affirming their valuable role in quantitative modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Innovation
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-025-00809-5
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in forecasting realized volatility: a review of methodologies

Nicolai Petkov, Radmir Mishelevich Leushuis
Financial Innovation
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Advances in forecasting realized volatility: a review of methodologies

Nicolai Petkov, Radmir Mishelevich Leushuis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, volatility modeling has gained increasing importance in quantitative finance, significantly influencing risk management, investment strategies, and policymaking. Traditionally, academic research has emphasized linear models for forecasting realized volatility. However, advances in computational power have enabled the development of more sophisticated approaches, including machine and deep learning models. Despite these advancements, no comprehensive survey currently compares traditional linear methods with newer models in the context of realized volatility forecasting. This survey addresses that gap by analyzing all models used to forecast realized volatility in academic literature from 2000 to the first half of 2024. It highlights key academic contributions and examines the empirical characteristics of realized volatility. Our findings indicate that the top-performing hybrid convolutional neural network and long short-term memory model surpasses other models in forecasting accuracy. These results highlight the ability of such models to capture a broader range of factors driving realized volatility, affirming their valuable role in quantitative modeling.

Financial InnovationVol. 12(1)
University of Groningen (NL)
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.