Evaluation of a thigh-worn accelerometer for detecting leg fidgeting and estimating its energetic cost via indirect calorimetry

Leg fidgeting, characterised by rhythmic lower limb movement while seated, is a spontaneous, low-intensity behaviour that may serve as a practical strategy to interrupt prolonged sedentary time. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of detecting leg fidgeting using a wearable thigh-mounted accelerometer, and to quantify its energetic cost in comparison to sitting, standing, and slow walking under controlled settings. Fifteen healthy adults (mean age = 35.6 ± 12 years; 33.3% male) completed five-minute bouts of sitting, fidgeting, standing, and slow walking while wearing a thigh-mounted accelerometer (SENS motion system). Behaviour classification was validated against direct observation, and energy expenditure was measured using breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry. The SENS classification of fidgeting was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy metrics. Energy expenditure was compared across activities using linear mixed-effects models, controlling for age, gender, and BMI. A total of 305 min of activity data were recorded. Balanced accuracy for activity classification ranged from 90.6% (slow walking) to 99.1% (standing), with fidgeting classified at 95.0%. The energy expenditure of fidgeting (mean = 1.69 kcal/min) was significantly different from sitting (1.49 kcal/min), standing (1.47 kcal/min), and slow walking (mean = 4.10 kcal/min). This study demonstrates that leg fidgeting can be detected using wearable sensors under controlled conditions. Furthermore, leg fidgeting expends slightly greater energy than expenditure compared to sitting and standing. Future research should examine its metabolic relevance in free-living settings and explore its role in daily movement patterns and in strategies to reduce prolonged sedentary time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33921-8
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a thigh-worn accelerometer for detecting leg fidgeting and estimating its energetic cost via indirect calorimetry

Anantha Narayanan, Matthew R. Wood, Tom Stewart, Scott Duncan
Scientific Reports
Physical Activity and Health
article

Evaluation of a thigh-worn accelerometer for detecting leg fidgeting and estimating its energetic cost via indirect calorimetry

Anantha Narayanan, Matthew R. Wood, Tom Stewart, Scott Duncan
article en

Abstract

Leg fidgeting, characterised by rhythmic lower limb movement while seated, is a spontaneous, low-intensity behaviour that may serve as a practical strategy to interrupt prolonged sedentary time. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of detecting leg fidgeting using a wearable thigh-mounted accelerometer, and to quantify its energetic cost in comparison to sitting, standing, and slow walking under controlled settings. Fifteen healthy adults (mean age = 35.6 ± 12 years; 33.3% male) completed five-minute bouts of sitting, fidgeting, standing, and slow walking while wearing a thigh-mounted accelerometer (SENS motion system). Behaviour classification was validated against direct observation, and energy expenditure was measured using breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry. The SENS classification of fidgeting was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy metrics. Energy expenditure was compared across activities using linear mixed-effects models, controlling for age, gender, and BMI. A total of 305 min of activity data were recorded. Balanced accuracy for activity classification ranged from 90.6% (slow walking) to 99.1% (standing), with fidgeting classified at 95.0%. The energy expenditure of fidgeting (mean = 1.69 kcal/min) was significantly different from sitting (1.49 kcal/min), standing (1.47 kcal/min), and slow walking (mean = 4.10 kcal/min). This study demonstrates that leg fidgeting can be detected using wearable sensors under controlled conditions. Furthermore, leg fidgeting expends slightly greater energy than expenditure compared to sitting and standing. Future research should examine its metabolic relevance in free-living settings and explore its role in daily movement patterns and in strategies to reduce prolonged sedentary time.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of a thigh-worn accelerometer for detecting leg fidgeting and estimating its energetic cost via indirect calorimetry — Anantha Narayanan, Matthew R. Wood, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS