Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities: a two-decade analysis

Purpose This study aims to analyse productivity change and its determinants in Australian public universities from 2001 to 2022. Design/methodology/approach The study uses bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist Productivity Index to examine productivity trends. Findings The main findings reveal that technological improvement has been the primary driver of productivity growth in universities. The technological frontier generally drives productivity, while the relative distance of universities from this frontier has changed only marginally, except during the COVID-19 period. During the pandemic, technological advancements slowed, but individual universities improved their relative positions. However, this trend reversed in 2021–2022, marking the worst period for productivity in the last two decades. Practical implications This study highlights the advantages of using multi-inputs and multi-outputs models over traditional ratio measures in accounting literature. The findings are expected to be of interest to universities, higher education policymakers and researchers. Social implications The productivity changes in Australian public universities have significant social implications. Enhanced productivity, driven by technological advancements, can improve educational quality and accessibility, thereby making public higher education more sustainable. This can also lead to better educational outcomes and greater social equity aligned with Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive analysis of productivity trends over two decades, contributing to the existing literature on higher education productivity in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Accounting Review
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/par-01-2025-0001
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities: a two-decade analysis

Amir Moradi-Motlagh
Pacific Accounting Review
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities: a two-decade analysis

Amir Moradi-Motlagh
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyse productivity change and its determinants in Australian public universities from 2001 to 2022. Design/methodology/approach The study uses bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist Productivity Index to examine productivity trends. Findings The main findings reveal that technological improvement has been the primary driver of productivity growth in universities. The technological frontier generally drives productivity, while the relative distance of universities from this frontier has changed only marginally, except during the COVID-19 period. During the pandemic, technological advancements slowed, but individual universities improved their relative positions. However, this trend reversed in 2021–2022, marking the worst period for productivity in the last two decades. Practical implications This study highlights the advantages of using multi-inputs and multi-outputs models over traditional ratio measures in accounting literature. The findings are expected to be of interest to universities, higher education policymakers and researchers. Social implications The productivity changes in Australian public universities have significant social implications. Enhanced productivity, driven by technological advancements, can improve educational quality and accessibility, thereby making public higher education more sustainable. This can also lead to better educational outcomes and greater social equity aligned with Sustainable Development Goals. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive analysis of productivity trends over two decades, contributing to the existing literature on higher education productivity in Australia.

Pacific Accounting ReviewVol. 38(2)
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.