Understanding technology paradoxes in local food retailing

Purpose Local producers and retailers continuously introduce new digital technologies and services for their customers. This study examines (1) which technology paradoxes operate within local food shopping contexts and (2) how these paradoxes influence consumers’ adoption or rejection of such tools. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model was developed and tested through a large-scale survey of 800 French consumers across gender, age and region. Structural equation modelling and multi-group A/B testing were employed to analyse the effects of technology paradoxes on (dis)satisfaction and the adoption or rejection of digital technologies for local food shopping. Findings Seven technology paradoxes were identified: efficiency-inefficiency, control-chaos, engaging-disengaging, interaction-isolation, competence-incompetence, freedom-enslavement and personalisation-privacy. A key finding is the asymmetrical impact of positive properties (e.g. efficiency and freedom) and negative properties (e.g. inefficiency and isolation) on technology use via (Dis)satisfaction; notably, negative properties exert a stronger effect, resulting in technology rejection. Originality/value This study is among the first to quantitatively examine technology paradoxes in local food shopping. It extends the technology-paradox framework to this retail context, demonstrates the role of negativity bias in technology adoption and reveals how local product characteristics moderate consumer responses. These findings provide valuable insights for developing more consumer-friendly digital solutions in local food retailing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-06-2025-0449
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding technology paradoxes in local food retailing

Léa Pecjak, Fabien Rogeon, Ludivine Destoumieux
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

Understanding technology paradoxes in local food retailing

Léa Pecjak, Fabien Rogeon, Ludivine Destoumieux
article en

Abstract

Purpose Local producers and retailers continuously introduce new digital technologies and services for their customers. This study examines (1) which technology paradoxes operate within local food shopping contexts and (2) how these paradoxes influence consumers’ adoption or rejection of such tools. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model was developed and tested through a large-scale survey of 800 French consumers across gender, age and region. Structural equation modelling and multi-group A/B testing were employed to analyse the effects of technology paradoxes on (dis)satisfaction and the adoption or rejection of digital technologies for local food shopping. Findings Seven technology paradoxes were identified: efficiency-inefficiency, control-chaos, engaging-disengaging, interaction-isolation, competence-incompetence, freedom-enslavement and personalisation-privacy. A key finding is the asymmetrical impact of positive properties (e.g. efficiency and freedom) and negative properties (e.g. inefficiency and isolation) on technology use via (Dis)satisfaction; notably, negative properties exert a stronger effect, resulting in technology rejection. Originality/value This study is among the first to quantitatively examine technology paradoxes in local food shopping. It extends the technology-paradox framework to this retail context, demonstrates the role of negativity bias in technology adoption and reveals how local product characteristics moderate consumer responses. These findings provide valuable insights for developing more consumer-friendly digital solutions in local food retailing.

International Journal of Retail & Distribution ManagementVol. 54(4)
Excelia Business School (FR), École Supérieure de Commerce (DZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.