Towards a standard framework for cybersecurity readiness for Nigerian universities

niversities rely substantially on digital infrastructure and host vast amounts of data that are of interest to malicious actors. Thus, they are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, making their protection a significant issue. While technology continues to improve, educational system infrastructures and system security lag behind. However, to ensure the continuous availability of university digital assets, the infrastructure must be prepared to withstand cyber-attacks. The results of research indicate that several models exist for evaluating the readiness of universities for cybersecurity. These models have been established for developed nations with more sophisticated and mature cyber networks, and may not be directly applicable to developing economies like Nigeria. Therefore, the Design Science Research strategy was adapted to develop a framework for assessing cybersecurity readiness in Nigerian universities. Taking into account pre-event, event management, and post-event factors, the concept of Cybersecurity Readiness Tiers (CRT) was developed to compare the cybersecurity readiness of universities. The Cybersecurity Readiness Framework was evaluated using data collected from candidate universities sampled for this study; Principal Component Analysis was carried out on the dataset to reduce the dimension. The Cybersecurity Readiness Index (CRI) scores, along with their respective distributions, indicate that 14 (65%) of the twenty universities fall in T1, while 6 (35%) fall in T2. The grouping was based on their overall cybersecurity readiness, as computed using the mathematical equations of the framework. Thus, it implies universities in T2 have a high level of readiness to resist cybersecurity incidents, while universities in T1 are at a very low level of readiness due to the weak and inconsistent cybersecurity controls implemented. This study suggests that these universities have gaps in event management and post-event capabilities that require attention. Therefore, a holistic web-based Cybersecurity Assessment tool that will incorporate all security and privacy regulations and best practices can be considered for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Mathematics Sciences and Technology for National Defense
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58524/app.sci.def.v3i3.780
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a standard framework for cybersecurity readiness for Nigerian universities

Tochukwu Kene Anyachebelu, Olusegun Hamed Olugbile, J. A. Ojeniyi
International Journal of Applied Mathematics Sciences and Technology for National Defense
Information and Cyber Security
article

Towards a standard framework for cybersecurity readiness for Nigerian universities

Tochukwu Kene Anyachebelu, Olusegun Hamed Olugbile, J. A. Ojeniyi
article en

Abstract

niversities rely substantially on digital infrastructure and host vast amounts of data that are of interest to malicious actors. Thus, they are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, making their protection a significant issue. While technology continues to improve, educational system infrastructures and system security lag behind. However, to ensure the continuous availability of university digital assets, the infrastructure must be prepared to withstand cyber-attacks. The results of research indicate that several models exist for evaluating the readiness of universities for cybersecurity. These models have been established for developed nations with more sophisticated and mature cyber networks, and may not be directly applicable to developing economies like Nigeria. Therefore, the Design Science Research strategy was adapted to develop a framework for assessing cybersecurity readiness in Nigerian universities. Taking into account pre-event, event management, and post-event factors, the concept of Cybersecurity Readiness Tiers (CRT) was developed to compare the cybersecurity readiness of universities. The Cybersecurity Readiness Framework was evaluated using data collected from candidate universities sampled for this study; Principal Component Analysis was carried out on the dataset to reduce the dimension. The Cybersecurity Readiness Index (CRI) scores, along with their respective distributions, indicate that 14 (65%) of the twenty universities fall in T1, while 6 (35%) fall in T2. The grouping was based on their overall cybersecurity readiness, as computed using the mathematical equations of the framework. Thus, it implies universities in T2 have a high level of readiness to resist cybersecurity incidents, while universities in T1 are at a very low level of readiness due to the weak and inconsistent cybersecurity controls implemented. This study suggests that these universities have gaps in event management and post-event capabilities that require attention. Therefore, a holistic web-based Cybersecurity Assessment tool that will incorporate all security and privacy regulations and best practices can be considered for future studies.

International Journal of Applied Mathematics Sciences and Technology for National DefenseVol. 3(3)
Nasarawa State University (NG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.