O14 Next-generation sequencing precision: on- and off-target analysis of gene editing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Abstract Introduction and aims Base editors (BEs) and prime editors (PEs) offer distinct advantages over CRISPR-Cas9 for correcting pathogenic variants. Previously, our group achieved 94.6% efficiency in correcting the COL7A1 c.5047 C>T nonsense pathogenic variant in fibroblasts, associated with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), using adenine base editor 8e (ABE8e). However, the safety and cell type-specific efficiencies of these techniques remain unclear. This study aims to use a PE to correct the c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant in primary patient fibroblasts and epidermal stem cells to promote wound healing and compare the efficiency and off-target effects of BE and PE using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods Primary fibroblasts carrying a heterozygous COL7A1 c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant were transfected with ABE8e mRNA and the PE5bmax system using electroporation and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Sanger sequencing and NGS were used to confirm pathogenic variant correction and assess editing efficiencies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted for genome-wide off-target analysis, with pairwise variant calling performed to identify somatic variants in edited vs. unedited samples. Targeted amplicon sequencing was employed to evaluate editing accuracy at the target site. Results ABE8e delivered via LNPs corrected the c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant in fibroblasts with 84% efficiency using lipofectamine, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing and NGS. Prime Editor PE5bmax achieved 43% overall editing efficiency, with 32% variant correction confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Preliminary WGS analysis revealed increased indels and mismatches across the genome in edited samples, although further variant characterization is needed for a comprehensive safety profile. Conclusions ABE8e and PE5bmax successfully corrected the c.5047 C>T mutation in fibroblasts, with respective on-target efficiencies of 84% and 32%. These strategies are being extended to epidermal stem cells for potential wound healing therapies. Comprehensive WGS and targeted sequencing will aid in optimizing these techniques for clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf429.014
Primary Topic
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O14 Next-generation sequencing precision: on- and off-target analysis of gene editing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Imogen Brooks, Carina Graham, I. Guri, J. McGrath et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
article

O14 Next-generation sequencing precision: on- and off-target analysis of gene editing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Imogen Brooks, Carina Graham, I. Guri, J. McGrath, Aidin Kazemizadeh, Madalina Alexandru, Yara Alrokh, Lukasz Laczmanski, Joanna Jackow-Malinowska
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and aims Base editors (BEs) and prime editors (PEs) offer distinct advantages over CRISPR-Cas9 for correcting pathogenic variants. Previously, our group achieved 94.6% efficiency in correcting the COL7A1 c.5047 C>T nonsense pathogenic variant in fibroblasts, associated with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), using adenine base editor 8e (ABE8e). However, the safety and cell type-specific efficiencies of these techniques remain unclear. This study aims to use a PE to correct the c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant in primary patient fibroblasts and epidermal stem cells to promote wound healing and compare the efficiency and off-target effects of BE and PE using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods Primary fibroblasts carrying a heterozygous COL7A1 c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant were transfected with ABE8e mRNA and the PE5bmax system using electroporation and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Sanger sequencing and NGS were used to confirm pathogenic variant correction and assess editing efficiencies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted for genome-wide off-target analysis, with pairwise variant calling performed to identify somatic variants in edited vs. unedited samples. Targeted amplicon sequencing was employed to evaluate editing accuracy at the target site. Results ABE8e delivered via LNPs corrected the c.5047 C>T pathogenic variant in fibroblasts with 84% efficiency using lipofectamine, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing and NGS. Prime Editor PE5bmax achieved 43% overall editing efficiency, with 32% variant correction confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Preliminary WGS analysis revealed increased indels and mismatches across the genome in edited samples, although further variant characterization is needed for a comprehensive safety profile. Conclusions ABE8e and PE5bmax successfully corrected the c.5047 C>T mutation in fibroblasts, with respective on-target efficiencies of 84% and 32%. These strategies are being extended to epidermal stem cells for potential wound healing therapies. Comprehensive WGS and targeted sequencing will aid in optimizing these techniques for clinical applications.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 194(1)
King's College London (GB), Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.