Can Native Vegetation in Agroecosystems Provide a Net Benefit for Pollinators, Despite Pesticide Use?

Abstract Pollinator health and population declines are of global concern, with ramifications for biodiversity conservation and the human food supply. Although the establishment of native flowering vegetation is a broadly supported pollinator conservation strategy, concerns about enhancing habitat in agroecosystems with widespread pesticide use remain. To evaluate this trade-off, we synthesized research findings for prairie strips, a model conservation practice that involves patches of diverse, native plants within row-crop fields. Prairie strips enhance pollinator forage quantity and quality, support a more diverse and abundant wild bee community, sustain monarch butterflies, and increase managed honey bee productivity. Although exposure to pesticides may occur, concentrations are typically below levels that have negative impacts on pollinator health. We discuss knowledge gaps and conclude native vegetation enhancements in agricultural landscapes, including those with widespread pesticide use, are a promising strategy for pollinator conservation, with the potential for net positive effects despite pesticide exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf194
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Native Vegetation in Agroecosystems Provide a Net Benefit for Pollinators, Despite Pesticide Use?

Maura J. Hall, John Tyndall, Ashley L. St. Clair, Steven P. Bradbury et al.
BioScience
Plant and animal studies
article

Can Native Vegetation in Agroecosystems Provide a Net Benefit for Pollinators, Despite Pesticide Use?

Maura J. Hall, John Tyndall, Ashley L. St. Clair, Steven P. Bradbury, Edward M. Hsieh, Adam G. Dolezal, Lisa A. Schulte, Kate Borchardt, Amy L. Toth, Matthew D. Stephenson, Matthew E. O’Neal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pollinator health and population declines are of global concern, with ramifications for biodiversity conservation and the human food supply. Although the establishment of native flowering vegetation is a broadly supported pollinator conservation strategy, concerns about enhancing habitat in agroecosystems with widespread pesticide use remain. To evaluate this trade-off, we synthesized research findings for prairie strips, a model conservation practice that involves patches of diverse, native plants within row-crop fields. Prairie strips enhance pollinator forage quantity and quality, support a more diverse and abundant wild bee community, sustain monarch butterflies, and increase managed honey bee productivity. Although exposure to pesticides may occur, concentrations are typically below levels that have negative impacts on pollinator health. We discuss knowledge gaps and conclude native vegetation enhancements in agricultural landscapes, including those with widespread pesticide use, are a promising strategy for pollinator conservation, with the potential for net positive effects despite pesticide exposure.

BioScience
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Iowa State University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Native Vegetation in Agroecosystems Provide a Net Benefit for Pollinators, Despite Pesticide Use? — Maura J. Hall, John Tyndall, et al. · BioScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS