Predicting early complications after surgical aortic valve replacement: A machine learning-based approach

Postoperative complications are a frequent concern following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. These adverse events contribute significantly to early postoperative morbidity and mortality, despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Identifying early predictive factors remains essential to guide clinical decision-making and reduce risk. To predict the occurrence of early postoperative complications or death after SAVR using a machine learning approach and to identify the most influential predictive parameters. We conducted a retrospective, observational study at our center, including patients operated on for severe aortic stenosis between January 2023 and September 2024. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or postoperative complication occurring within 30 days. Complications included stroke, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, nosocomial infection, pericardial effusion, and surgical reintervention. Patients were divided into two groups: class 0 (no complication or death) and class 1 (at least one complication or death). Data included clinical, echocardiographic (pre- and postoperative), and intraoperative variables. A supervised k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm was used for classification. Additionally, a Mann-Whitney test was used to compare LV mass between groups, ( Figure 1 ). Among the variables tested, the k-NN model identified four main predictors: preoperative left ventricular (LV) mass, mean transprosthetic gradient, postoperative prosthetic valve area, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. In contrast, variables such as the presence of comorbidities, LV ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) did not improve prediction and were not retained by the model. The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for the no-complication group prediction, with 89% accuracy, 100% precision, and 100% recall. However, due to class imbalance, it showed limited ability to predict complications. The Mann-Whitney test showed a significantly lower mean LV mass in patients with complications (136.97 g/m 2 ) compared to those without (174.56 g/m 2 ), with P = 0.042, ( Figure 1 ). Preoperative LV mass, bypass duration, and postoperative prosthetic parameters are associated with early complications or death after SAVR. The k-NN algorithm identified patients at low risk, but failed to capture high-risk cases, likely due to dataset imbalance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of cardiovascular diseases
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2025.10.131
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting early complications after surgical aortic valve replacement: A machine learning-based approach

Boulnouar Djafer, Asma Moussaoui, Y. Fellague-Chebra, A. Amrouche et al.
Archives of cardiovascular diseases
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Predicting early complications after surgical aortic valve replacement: A machine learning-based approach

Boulnouar Djafer, Asma Moussaoui, Y. Fellague-Chebra, A. Amrouche, H. Achi, A. Haddad, F. Allaoui, N. Medjber, Y. Aitaliyahia
article en

Abstract

Postoperative complications are a frequent concern following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. These adverse events contribute significantly to early postoperative morbidity and mortality, despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Identifying early predictive factors remains essential to guide clinical decision-making and reduce risk. To predict the occurrence of early postoperative complications or death after SAVR using a machine learning approach and to identify the most influential predictive parameters. We conducted a retrospective, observational study at our center, including patients operated on for severe aortic stenosis between January 2023 and September 2024. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or postoperative complication occurring within 30 days. Complications included stroke, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, nosocomial infection, pericardial effusion, and surgical reintervention. Patients were divided into two groups: class 0 (no complication or death) and class 1 (at least one complication or death). Data included clinical, echocardiographic (pre- and postoperative), and intraoperative variables. A supervised k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm was used for classification. Additionally, a Mann-Whitney test was used to compare LV mass between groups, ( Figure 1 ). Among the variables tested, the k-NN model identified four main predictors: preoperative left ventricular (LV) mass, mean transprosthetic gradient, postoperative prosthetic valve area, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. In contrast, variables such as the presence of comorbidities, LV ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) did not improve prediction and were not retained by the model. The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for the no-complication group prediction, with 89% accuracy, 100% precision, and 100% recall. However, due to class imbalance, it showed limited ability to predict complications. The Mann-Whitney test showed a significantly lower mean LV mass in patients with complications (136.97 g/m 2 ) compared to those without (174.56 g/m 2 ), with P = 0.042, ( Figure 1 ). Preoperative LV mass, bypass duration, and postoperative prosthetic parameters are associated with early complications or death after SAVR. The k-NN algorithm identified patients at low risk, but failed to capture high-risk cases, likely due to dataset imbalance.

Archives of cardiovascular diseasesVol. 119(1)
Ecole Mohammadia d'Ingénieurs (MA), University of Béjaïa (DZ), École Nationale Supérieure d'Informatique (DZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.