Detecting false positives with PLATO using double-aperture photometry and centroid shifts

Context . PLATO will discover exoplanets and characterize their host stars. Since photometry for most PLATO targets will be extracted on board, an efficient strategy to detect false positives (FPs) – transit-like signals not caused by planets – is needed. Centroid shifts are a standard FP diagnostic; however, only 5–20% of PLATO’s largest stellar sample (P5 sample) will have centroids computed on board. An alternative onboard strategy is required for the remaining targets. Aims . We propose a double-aperture photometry strategy to detect FPs and test two mask types: extended masks, which enlarge the nominal aperture, and secondary masks, centered on the main contaminant. For each mask we derive flux and centroid metrics to assess their ability to discriminate FPs. Methods . Using Gaia Data Release 3, we defined our P5 targets and background stars, which we assumed to be eclipsing binaries with transit depths and durations drawn from observed distributions. From simulated photometry and centroids, we computed extended and secondary fluxes and also extended, secondary, and nominal centroids, and compared the FP detection efficiency of each metric. Results . Under these assumptions, ~35% of P5 targets have a single FP-creating contaminant, and ~22% have two or more. Extended centroid shifts reach an efficiency of 87%, while nominal and secondary centroids reach 84% and 75%, respectively. The secondary flux attains an efficiency of 92%, whereas the extended flux reaches 73%. Conclusions . The secondary flux is the most efficient metric. Since double-aperture photometry is 50% less demanding in CPU and telemetry budgets, secondary and extended fluxes are optimal for most P5 targets. Secondary masks are optimal for targets with one FP-creating contaminant. Extended masks are preferable when extended flux is competitive with centroids. Our results show that double-aperture photometry and centroid shifts will allow PLATO to discard a large fraction of false positives caused by eclipsing binaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453294
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting false positives with PLATO using double-aperture photometry and centroid shifts

P. Guterman, A. Santerne, A. C. Birch, C. Damiani et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Detecting false positives with PLATO using double-aperture photometry and centroid shifts

P. Guterman, A. Santerne, A. C. Birch, C. Damiani, Carsten Paproth, R. Samadi, Martin Pertenaïs, J. Cabrera, F. Gutiérrez-Canales
article en

Abstract

Context . PLATO will discover exoplanets and characterize their host stars. Since photometry for most PLATO targets will be extracted on board, an efficient strategy to detect false positives (FPs) – transit-like signals not caused by planets – is needed. Centroid shifts are a standard FP diagnostic; however, only 5–20% of PLATO’s largest stellar sample (P5 sample) will have centroids computed on board. An alternative onboard strategy is required for the remaining targets. Aims . We propose a double-aperture photometry strategy to detect FPs and test two mask types: extended masks, which enlarge the nominal aperture, and secondary masks, centered on the main contaminant. For each mask we derive flux and centroid metrics to assess their ability to discriminate FPs. Methods . Using Gaia Data Release 3, we defined our P5 targets and background stars, which we assumed to be eclipsing binaries with transit depths and durations drawn from observed distributions. From simulated photometry and centroids, we computed extended and secondary fluxes and also extended, secondary, and nominal centroids, and compared the FP detection efficiency of each metric. Results . Under these assumptions, ~35% of P5 targets have a single FP-creating contaminant, and ~22% have two or more. Extended centroid shifts reach an efficiency of 87%, while nominal and secondary centroids reach 84% and 75%, respectively. The secondary flux attains an efficiency of 92%, whereas the extended flux reaches 73%. Conclusions . The secondary flux is the most efficient metric. Since double-aperture photometry is 50% less demanding in CPU and telemetry budgets, secondary and extended fluxes are optimal for most P5 targets. Secondary masks are optimal for targets with one FP-creating contaminant. Extended masks are preferable when extended flux is competitive with centroids. Our results show that double-aperture photometry and centroid shifts will allow PLATO to discard a large fraction of false positives caused by eclipsing binaries.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 707
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Délégation Paris 7 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
European Space Agency, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.