Impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in oocytes on embryo development and clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERAs) in oocytes on embryo development and clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles remains controversial, creating uncertainty in clinical decision-making, particularly regarding whether SERA-containing oocytes should be used or excluded during ICSI. This meta-analysis evaluates the effect of SERAs on these outcomes and provides evidence to inform clinical practice in assisted reproductive technology. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, and CBM to identify studies assessing impact of SERAs on embryo development and clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles. Both prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. Only ICSI cycles were included, and studies were eligible if they reported at least one relevant embryological or clinical endpoint. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and meta-analysis was conducted RevMan 5.3 to estimate fertilization rate, Day 3 high-quality embryo, blastocyst formation, implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth. Sixteen studies were included, comprising 17,001 SERA-negative cycles and 2,336 SERA-positive cycles. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between SERA-positive and SERA-negative groups in fertilization rate (I2 = 69%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.05; P = 0.18), Day 3 high-quality embryo rate (I2 = 96%, OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.67–1.60, P = 0.88), blastocyst formation rate (I2 = 90%, OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.71–1.14, P = 0.37), implantation rate (I2 = 61%, OR = 0.97, 95%CI 0.77–1.20, P = 0.73), clinical pregnancy rate (I2 = 27%, OR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.92–1.14, P = 0.68), miscarriage rate (I2 = 0%, OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.94–1.45, P = 0.17), and live birth rate (I2 = 58%, OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.82–1.36, P = 0.65). This meta-analysis indicates that SERAs in oocytes do not significantly affect embryo development or clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles, suggesting that SERA-positive oocytes may not need to be routinely discarded during clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01935-5
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in oocytes on embryo development and clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

Junbiao Mao, J. W. Wang, Ben Yuan
Journal of Ovarian Research
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in oocytes on embryo development and clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

Junbiao Mao, J. W. Wang, Ben Yuan
article en

Abstract

The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERAs) in oocytes on embryo development and clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles remains controversial, creating uncertainty in clinical decision-making, particularly regarding whether SERA-containing oocytes should be used or excluded during ICSI. This meta-analysis evaluates the effect of SERAs on these outcomes and provides evidence to inform clinical practice in assisted reproductive technology. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, and CBM to identify studies assessing impact of SERAs on embryo development and clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles. Both prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. Only ICSI cycles were included, and studies were eligible if they reported at least one relevant embryological or clinical endpoint. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and meta-analysis was conducted RevMan 5.3 to estimate fertilization rate, Day 3 high-quality embryo, blastocyst formation, implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth. Sixteen studies were included, comprising 17,001 SERA-negative cycles and 2,336 SERA-positive cycles. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between SERA-positive and SERA-negative groups in fertilization rate (I2 = 69%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.05; P = 0.18), Day 3 high-quality embryo rate (I2 = 96%, OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.67–1.60, P = 0.88), blastocyst formation rate (I2 = 90%, OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.71–1.14, P = 0.37), implantation rate (I2 = 61%, OR = 0.97, 95%CI 0.77–1.20, P = 0.73), clinical pregnancy rate (I2 = 27%, OR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.92–1.14, P = 0.68), miscarriage rate (I2 = 0%, OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.94–1.45, P = 0.17), and live birth rate (I2 = 58%, OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.82–1.36, P = 0.65). This meta-analysis indicates that SERAs in oocytes do not significantly affect embryo development or clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles, suggesting that SERA-positive oocytes may not need to be routinely discarded during clinical decision-making.

Journal of Ovarian ResearchVol. 19(1)
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Hubei Polytechnic University (CN), Huangshi Central Hospital (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.