Building variation in visual displays through discrete modifications of motion

Interactions between conspecifics are often composed of one or more discrete behavioural displays. Here, we evaluate a behaviour used in aggressive interactions between conspecific males of 10 species of leaf warblers (Phylloscopus). Using high-speed videography and methods derived from geometric morphometrics, we find that the form of a primary visual display differs significantly among species, but with large intra-specific variation and much overlap in shape space. Additional interspecific differences include a species that does not move its wings at all, two qualitatively different displays in the behavioural repertoire and the loss or gain of a pale patch on the wing. We conclude that display evolution proceeds largely by adding or subtracting discrete components from an established repertoire, accompanied by slight modifications of the core display. In these ways, more complex displays evolve on the background of the ancestral signal, thereby enabling modifications to appear without loss of ancestral efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2669
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building variation in visual displays through discrete modifications of motion

Trevor D. Price, Kristina Fialko
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Building variation in visual displays through discrete modifications of motion

Trevor D. Price, Kristina Fialko
article en

Abstract

Interactions between conspecifics are often composed of one or more discrete behavioural displays. Here, we evaluate a behaviour used in aggressive interactions between conspecific males of 10 species of leaf warblers (Phylloscopus). Using high-speed videography and methods derived from geometric morphometrics, we find that the form of a primary visual display differs significantly among species, but with large intra-specific variation and much overlap in shape space. Additional interspecific differences include a species that does not move its wings at all, two qualitatively different displays in the behavioural repertoire and the loss or gain of a pale patch on the wing. We conclude that display evolution proceeds largely by adding or subtracting discrete components from an established repertoire, accompanied by slight modifications of the core display. In these ways, more complex displays evolve on the background of the ancestral signal, thereby enabling modifications to appear without loss of ancestral efficacy.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2062)
Princeton University (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.