Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Discussions of the decolonisation of quantitative methods have often been overlooked in recent debates. Using Chilisa’s integrative and adaptive methodological framework, we provide a critically reflexive account of the design process of an online multi-lingual survey that sought to unpack pluriversal understandings of democracy in South Africa. The article describes the process we developed to surface the latent assumptions of mainstream survey instruments measuring the understanding of democracy across Africa, and how we used this to inform the development of our own survey instrument. Reflecting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach, we also consider the role of translation as an epistemic exercise. In turn, this leads us to question the epistemic and cultural assumptions that are embedded in the Likert scale and how uncritical adaptation may undermine decolonial intentions. By sharing these insights, we hope to expand the discussion of the decolonisation of quantitative methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2608154
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Carin Runciman, Boitumelo Matlala
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Carin Runciman, Boitumelo Matlala
article en

Abstract

Discussions of the decolonisation of quantitative methods have often been overlooked in recent debates. Using Chilisa’s integrative and adaptive methodological framework, we provide a critically reflexive account of the design process of an online multi-lingual survey that sought to unpack pluriversal understandings of democracy in South Africa. The article describes the process we developed to surface the latent assumptions of mainstream survey instruments measuring the understanding of democracy across Africa, and how we used this to inform the development of our own survey instrument. Reflecting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach, we also consider the role of translation as an epistemic exercise. In turn, this leads us to question the epistemic and cultural assumptions that are embedded in the Likert scale and how uncritical adaptation may undermine decolonial intentions. By sharing these insights, we hope to expand the discussion of the decolonisation of quantitative methods.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Human Sciences Research Council (ZA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project — Carin Runciman, Boitumelo Matlala · International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS