The Dutch Point‐based Eco‐scheme: a Transition to a Results‐based Policy

Summary In this article we present the Dutch eco‐scheme as an example of a results‐based scheme which fits well into the ‘new delivery model’ of the CAP 2023–2027. Implemented in 2023, the scheme offers farmers a menu of 22 eco‐activities, from which they can choose every year. Uptake exceeds expectations and comprises approximately 2/3 of the total utilised agricultural area. The points and medal system, with multiple eco‐objectives (5 combinations), minimum thresholds, regional differences and differentiated payments is relatively complex compared to how other MSs have implemented the CAP eco‐schemes. However, partly due to EU legislation around compensation rules, the system now contains a hybrid form, in which the maximum possible cost‐effectiveness will not yet be realised (implicit prices for eco‐points differ over activities due to the calculated income forgone and cost incurred of a particular eco‐activity).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EuroChoices
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dutch Point‐based Eco‐scheme: a Transition to a Results‐based Policy

Marcel van Asseldonk, Roel Jongeneel, Cor Graveland
1 citations
EuroChoices
Environmental Conservation and Management
2.42
article

The Dutch Point‐based Eco‐scheme: a Transition to a Results‐based Policy

Marcel van Asseldonk, Roel Jongeneel, Cor Graveland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Summary In this article we present the Dutch eco‐scheme as an example of a results‐based scheme which fits well into the ‘new delivery model’ of the CAP 2023–2027. Implemented in 2023, the scheme offers farmers a menu of 22 eco‐activities, from which they can choose every year. Uptake exceeds expectations and comprises approximately 2/3 of the total utilised agricultural area. The points and medal system, with multiple eco‐objectives (5 combinations), minimum thresholds, regional differences and differentiated payments is relatively complex compared to how other MSs have implemented the CAP eco‐schemes. However, partly due to EU legislation around compensation rules, the system now contains a hybrid form, in which the maximum possible cost‐effectiveness will not yet be realised (implicit prices for eco‐points differ over activities due to the calculated income forgone and cost incurred of a particular eco‐activity).

EuroChoicesVol. 24(3)
Netherlands Enterprise Agency (NL), Department of Social Sciences (RU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental Conservation and Management
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.