Biofluid biomarkers across neurological disorders: a systematic meta‐analysis of shared and unique molecular signatures

Abstract Background A comprehensive analysis of proximity‐extension assay (PEA) proteomic studies have led to the development and validation of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker panels for Alzheimer's disease (AD; Del Campo et al., 2022 Nat Aging ) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB; Del Campo et al., 2023 Nat Comm .). However, to what extent the markers are dementia‐ and matrix‐ (CSF or plasma) specific is largely unknown. To establish the clinical context for these novel markers, data from PEA proteomic studies in CSF and plasma will be collected and meta‐analyzed across neurological disorders. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA‐guidelines is being conducted to collect relevant CSF and plasma PEA studies. For six CSF and plasma studies with readily available data in dementia and movement disorders, Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for seven proteins identified as AD‐specific (ABL1, ITGB2, ENO2, SMOC2, and THOP1) or DLB‐specific (DDC and CRH) – measuring the mean difference between disease and control groups. A random‐effects meta‐analysis model was applied within the same disorders and plotted, Figure 1. Results Analysis showed that for all seven proteins, when comparing effect sizes between CSF and plasma, the direction of change is opposite. This suggests that these markers may only be useful in CSF, and in plasma may even associate with other disorders; as THOP1 seems to be most increased in prodromal PD, Figure 1. Within‐disease analysis revealed variability mainly in preclinical AD, for ABL1, ITGB2, and THOP1, and prodromal PD for DDC, supporting the biological heterogeneity of these groups. Additionally, DDC and CRH in CSF are distinctly dysregulated for Parkinson's‐plus syndromes (PD, DLB, PSP, CBS) highlighting the overlapping biological mechanisms. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis across multiple cohorts is expanding to include around 150 studies in dementias, movement disorders and in psychiatric conditions. The framework of analysis established in this study provides a foundation for future expansion of the database in various neurological disorders, such as psychiatric disorders, and to other proteomic platforms. These findings may contribute to the development of more accurate diagnostic tools and offer insights into the complex interplay of protein markers in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105820
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biofluid biomarkers across neurological disorders: a systematic meta‐analysis of shared and unique molecular signatures

Kira Trares, Elena R. Blujdea, Yanaika S. Hok‐A‐Hin, Marta del Campo et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Biofluid biomarkers across neurological disorders: a systematic meta‐analysis of shared and unique molecular signatures

Kira Trares, Elena R. Blujdea, Yanaika S. Hok‐A‐Hin, Marta del Campo, Lisa Vermunt, Charlotte E. Teunissen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A comprehensive analysis of proximity‐extension assay (PEA) proteomic studies have led to the development and validation of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker panels for Alzheimer's disease (AD; Del Campo et al., 2022 Nat Aging ) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB; Del Campo et al., 2023 Nat Comm .). However, to what extent the markers are dementia‐ and matrix‐ (CSF or plasma) specific is largely unknown. To establish the clinical context for these novel markers, data from PEA proteomic studies in CSF and plasma will be collected and meta‐analyzed across neurological disorders. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA‐guidelines is being conducted to collect relevant CSF and plasma PEA studies. For six CSF and plasma studies with readily available data in dementia and movement disorders, Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for seven proteins identified as AD‐specific (ABL1, ITGB2, ENO2, SMOC2, and THOP1) or DLB‐specific (DDC and CRH) – measuring the mean difference between disease and control groups. A random‐effects meta‐analysis model was applied within the same disorders and plotted, Figure 1. Results Analysis showed that for all seven proteins, when comparing effect sizes between CSF and plasma, the direction of change is opposite. This suggests that these markers may only be useful in CSF, and in plasma may even associate with other disorders; as THOP1 seems to be most increased in prodromal PD, Figure 1. Within‐disease analysis revealed variability mainly in preclinical AD, for ABL1, ITGB2, and THOP1, and prodromal PD for DDC, supporting the biological heterogeneity of these groups. Additionally, DDC and CRH in CSF are distinctly dysregulated for Parkinson's‐plus syndromes (PD, DLB, PSP, CBS) highlighting the overlapping biological mechanisms. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis across multiple cohorts is expanding to include around 150 studies in dementias, movement disorders and in psychiatric conditions. The framework of analysis established in this study provides a foundation for future expansion of the database in various neurological disorders, such as psychiatric disorders, and to other proteomic platforms. These findings may contribute to the development of more accurate diagnostic tools and offer insights into the complex interplay of protein markers in neurodegenerative diseases.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.