Climate resilient housing features in rental housing: Linking tenant satisfaction with rent premiums for retrofit decisions

Meeting net-zero targets and adapting to climate change requires substantial investments in retrofitting the existing housing stock with climate-resilient features. In rental housing, which lags substantially behind owner-occupied housing in terms of sustainability investments, it remains unclear whether the features that enhance tenants’ quality of life under changing climatic conditions also translate into rent premiums. This paper examines whether climate-resilient housing features (defined as features that enhance energy, water, and thermal performance of housing in response to climatic variability and energy insecurity) differ in their effects on housing satisfaction versus rental value. Understanding the potential trade‑off is essential to unlock further sustainability-related investments in rental housing. Using the 2022 Australian housing conditions dataset and multilevel mixed models, we find that climate-resilient housing features are more closely associated with housing satisfaction than with rent. Among the eight features studied, only outdoor shutters/awnings and double-glazed windows have ‘rent premiums’ of 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively, while also positively influencing housing satisfaction. Solar panels were significant only in the base rental model. Three other features (i.e., charging stations for electric vehicles, ceiling and wall insulation, and solar panels) positively influence satisfaction but are unrelated to rents. We discuss the implications of our findings for housing retrofit, sustainability investments, and housing policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.116973
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate resilient housing features in rental housing: Linking tenant satisfaction with rent premiums for retrofit decisions

Nafisah Alaalbun Akudbillah, Godwin Kavaarpuo, Samuel Swanzy-Impraim
Energy and Buildings
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Climate resilient housing features in rental housing: Linking tenant satisfaction with rent premiums for retrofit decisions

Nafisah Alaalbun Akudbillah, Godwin Kavaarpuo, Samuel Swanzy-Impraim
article en

Abstract

Meeting net-zero targets and adapting to climate change requires substantial investments in retrofitting the existing housing stock with climate-resilient features. In rental housing, which lags substantially behind owner-occupied housing in terms of sustainability investments, it remains unclear whether the features that enhance tenants’ quality of life under changing climatic conditions also translate into rent premiums. This paper examines whether climate-resilient housing features (defined as features that enhance energy, water, and thermal performance of housing in response to climatic variability and energy insecurity) differ in their effects on housing satisfaction versus rental value. Understanding the potential trade‑off is essential to unlock further sustainability-related investments in rental housing. Using the 2022 Australian housing conditions dataset and multilevel mixed models, we find that climate-resilient housing features are more closely associated with housing satisfaction than with rent. Among the eight features studied, only outdoor shutters/awnings and double-glazed windows have ‘rent premiums’ of 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively, while also positively influencing housing satisfaction. Solar panels were significant only in the base rental model. Three other features (i.e., charging stations for electric vehicles, ceiling and wall insulation, and solar panels) positively influence satisfaction but are unrelated to rents. We discuss the implications of our findings for housing retrofit, sustainability investments, and housing policy.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 354
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU), Department of Education and Training (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.