Prompt engineering for non-native English learners: A generative AI approach to personalised language feedback

This study explores the effectiveness of ChatGPT-generated feedback on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ writing by comparing three prompt types: general, grammar-focused, and EFL-tailored. It also examines the quality of AI-generated feedback through expert evaluations and explores student perceptions related to clarity, usefulness, and motivation. This study employed an empirical mixed-methods design, combining quantitative expert evaluations and student perception surveys. Thirty-two university students completed a writing task and received feedback generated using each prompt type. Three expert raters assessed the feedback based on relevance, clarity, usefulness, and tone. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Additionally, a student perception survey was administered in three parts: multiple-choice comparisons, Likert-scale attitudes, and multiple-answer reflections. Results indicate that EFL-tailored feedback was consistently rated highest by both experts and students. Students found this feedback easier to understand, more motivating, and most helpful in improving their writing. The findings underscore the importance of prompt design in generating personalised and effective AI feedback. The study supports integrating ChatGPT into EFL instruction and offers implications for pedagogy, technology use, and future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prompt engineering for non-native English learners: A generative AI approach to personalised language feedback

Faiz Algobaei, Elham Alzain
1 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
17.70
article

Prompt engineering for non-native English learners: A generative AI approach to personalised language feedback

Faiz Algobaei, Elham Alzain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of ChatGPT-generated feedback on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ writing by comparing three prompt types: general, grammar-focused, and EFL-tailored. It also examines the quality of AI-generated feedback through expert evaluations and explores student perceptions related to clarity, usefulness, and motivation. This study employed an empirical mixed-methods design, combining quantitative expert evaluations and student perception surveys. Thirty-two university students completed a writing task and received feedback generated using each prompt type. Three expert raters assessed the feedback based on relevance, clarity, usefulness, and tone. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Additionally, a student perception survey was administered in three parts: multiple-choice comparisons, Likert-scale attitudes, and multiple-answer reflections. Results indicate that EFL-tailored feedback was consistently rated highest by both experts and students. Students found this feedback easier to understand, more motivating, and most helpful in improving their writing. The findings underscore the importance of prompt design in generating personalised and effective AI feedback. The study supports integrating ChatGPT into EFL instruction and offers implications for pedagogy, technology use, and future research.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
​​Jubail University College (SA), King Faisal University (SA), Jubail Industrial College (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
17.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.