Towards explainable visual question answering via cross-modal causal reasoning

Explainable Visual Question Answering (EVQA) aims to not only predict accurate answers to visual questions but also generate human-friendly multimodal explanations that reveal the underlying reasoning process. Despite significant progress, existing EVQA methods suffer from two critical limitations: (1) they often rely on spurious cross-modal correlations (e.g., linguistic biases or visual shortcuts) rather than genuine causal relations, leading to unreliable reasoning; (2) the consistency between predicted answers and generated explanations is compromised due to the lack of explicit modeling of their causal dependencies. To address these issues, we propose a Cross-Modal Causal Reasoning (CMCR) framework that integrates causal inference with multimodal learning to disentangle causal effects from spurious correlations and enforce answer-explanation consistency. Specifically, CMCR incorporates three key innovations: (1) Causal Intervention, which employs backdoor adjustment to eliminate linguistic biases and frontdoor adjustment to mitigate visual shortcut biases; (2) a Neural-Symbolic Explanation Generator designed to translate symbolic reasoning processes into natural language explanations, thereby enhancing process explainability; and (3) Variational Causal Inference, which enforces causal consistency between answers and explanations. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that CMCR outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 1.19% higher accuracy, a 1.05% higher grounding for explanation quality, and a 0.42% higher answer-explanation consistency. • We formalize EVQA within a structural causal model to distinguish genuine causal paths. • We design a causal intervention module to refine visual and linguistic representations. • We formulate variational causal inference to enforce the causal consistency. • We introduce a neural-symbolic explanation generator to generate multimodal explanation. • Experiments demonstrate that CMCR outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.113765
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards explainable visual question answering via cross-modal causal reasoning

Z. Y. Li, Wei Li, Fuyun Deng
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
article

Towards explainable visual question answering via cross-modal causal reasoning

Z. Y. Li, Wei Li, Fuyun Deng
article en

Abstract

Explainable Visual Question Answering (EVQA) aims to not only predict accurate answers to visual questions but also generate human-friendly multimodal explanations that reveal the underlying reasoning process. Despite significant progress, existing EVQA methods suffer from two critical limitations: (1) they often rely on spurious cross-modal correlations (e.g., linguistic biases or visual shortcuts) rather than genuine causal relations, leading to unreliable reasoning; (2) the consistency between predicted answers and generated explanations is compromised due to the lack of explicit modeling of their causal dependencies. To address these issues, we propose a Cross-Modal Causal Reasoning (CMCR) framework that integrates causal inference with multimodal learning to disentangle causal effects from spurious correlations and enforce answer-explanation consistency. Specifically, CMCR incorporates three key innovations: (1) Causal Intervention, which employs backdoor adjustment to eliminate linguistic biases and frontdoor adjustment to mitigate visual shortcut biases; (2) a Neural-Symbolic Explanation Generator designed to translate symbolic reasoning processes into natural language explanations, thereby enhancing process explainability; and (3) Variational Causal Inference, which enforces causal consistency between answers and explanations. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that CMCR outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 1.19% higher accuracy, a 1.05% higher grounding for explanation quality, and a 0.42% higher answer-explanation consistency. • We formalize EVQA within a structural causal model to distinguish genuine causal paths. • We design a causal intervention module to refine visual and linguistic representations. • We formulate variational causal inference to enforce the causal consistency. • We introduce a neural-symbolic explanation generator to generate multimodal explanation. • Experiments demonstrate that CMCR outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 167
Guangxi Normal University (CN), Liupanshui Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.