Factors affecting the industry–academia collaboration: a case study of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Islamabad, Pakistan

Purpose The industry–academia collaboration (IAC) at the higher education level is greatly impacted by various factors. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing IAC in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Islamabad, focusing on educational interactions (EDU), academic entrepreneurship (ENT) and research-related interactions (RRI). Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a quantitative approach by forming research questions using a critical study of literature and collected data from 80 faculty members selected through stratified sampling across public and private HEIs through the survey method. Statistical analyses, including reliability tests, descriptive tests, correlation, ANOVA, multiple regression and multicollinearity, reveal that while all three factors significantly contribute to IAC, ENT emerges as the strongest predictor (β = 0.586, p < 0.01), followed by RRI (β = 0.194, p < 0.01) and EDU (β = 0.152, p < 0.05). Findings The findings indicate moderate engagement in educational initiatives such as guest lectures and field visits, but limited efforts in RRI and ENT activities. These factors explain 76.2% of the variability in collaboration outcomes. Key barriers include the lack of structured policies, insufficient funding and misaligned academic outputs with industry needs. This study highlights the need for a robust entrepreneurial system, targeted policies and strengthened collaboration frameworks to enhance IAC. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to the perspectives of faculty members from a small sample of HEIs in Islamabad, which may not fully capture the industry’s viewpoint, ignoring the viewpoint of industrial experts because of limited resources. Additionally, it does not address external factors such as government policies or global market dynamics. Practical implications This research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable innovation and provides actionable strategies for bridging the academia–industry gap. Originality/value This pilot study provides valuable insights for researchers interested in a larger IAC. It also provides insights for HEI managers who want to understand the motivations of industry participants in RRI. These insights are not only relevant for Pakistan but also for other developing nations seeking to leverage IAC for sustainable innovation. This research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable innovation and provides actionable strategies for bridging the academia–industry gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Education for All
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qea-12-2024-0145
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors affecting the industry–academia collaboration: a case study of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Islamabad, Pakistan

Shafiqur Rehman, Muhammad Umer Alvi, Asim Qayyum Butt, Muhammad Asad Shahzad
Quality Education for All
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Factors affecting the industry–academia collaboration: a case study of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Islamabad, Pakistan

Shafiqur Rehman, Muhammad Umer Alvi, Asim Qayyum Butt, Muhammad Asad Shahzad
article en

Abstract

Purpose The industry–academia collaboration (IAC) at the higher education level is greatly impacted by various factors. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing IAC in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Islamabad, focusing on educational interactions (EDU), academic entrepreneurship (ENT) and research-related interactions (RRI). Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a quantitative approach by forming research questions using a critical study of literature and collected data from 80 faculty members selected through stratified sampling across public and private HEIs through the survey method. Statistical analyses, including reliability tests, descriptive tests, correlation, ANOVA, multiple regression and multicollinearity, reveal that while all three factors significantly contribute to IAC, ENT emerges as the strongest predictor (β = 0.586, p < 0.01), followed by RRI (β = 0.194, p < 0.01) and EDU (β = 0.152, p < 0.05). Findings The findings indicate moderate engagement in educational initiatives such as guest lectures and field visits, but limited efforts in RRI and ENT activities. These factors explain 76.2% of the variability in collaboration outcomes. Key barriers include the lack of structured policies, insufficient funding and misaligned academic outputs with industry needs. This study highlights the need for a robust entrepreneurial system, targeted policies and strengthened collaboration frameworks to enhance IAC. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to the perspectives of faculty members from a small sample of HEIs in Islamabad, which may not fully capture the industry’s viewpoint, ignoring the viewpoint of industrial experts because of limited resources. Additionally, it does not address external factors such as government policies or global market dynamics. Practical implications This research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable innovation and provides actionable strategies for bridging the academia–industry gap. Originality/value This pilot study provides valuable insights for researchers interested in a larger IAC. It also provides insights for HEI managers who want to understand the motivations of industry participants in RRI. These insights are not only relevant for Pakistan but also for other developing nations seeking to leverage IAC for sustainable innovation. This research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable innovation and provides actionable strategies for bridging the academia–industry gap.

Quality Education for AllVol. 3(1)
Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology (PK), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.