What Do We Know about Character Strengths in Autistic People? A Systematic Review

Abstract Purpose of Review This systematic review examined the assessment of Character Strengths (CS) and related outcome variables in autistic people across the lifespan. Recent Findings 9 quantitative and 7 qualitative studies from five databases met full inclusion criteria. Parent/carer reported children’s CS using open-text questions (e.g., describe “best things” about your child) and questionnaires analogous to CS framework. Autistic adults used self-report measures such as the Values-in-Action Survey, or Temperament and Character Inventory. Parent/carer reports of CS in autistic children and young people mostly included Humanity strengths (e.g., Love, Kindness), whereas autistic adults’ self-report endorsed a greater diversity of CS (e.g., Fairness, Curiosity, Honesty). Only six studies explored the association between CS and wellbeing/life satisfaction. Summary The use of CS-specific assessment tools in autism research is limited to date. Centred around autistic voices, future research can triangulate information from multiple informants across different contexts to further explore environmental barriers and facilitators for CS development over time, to create more opportunities for authentic strengths expression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-025-00342-1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Do We Know about Character Strengths in Autistic People? A Systematic Review

Jiedi Lei, Daniela Krouzkova
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

What Do We Know about Character Strengths in Autistic People? A Systematic Review

Jiedi Lei, Daniela Krouzkova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This systematic review examined the assessment of Character Strengths (CS) and related outcome variables in autistic people across the lifespan. Recent Findings 9 quantitative and 7 qualitative studies from five databases met full inclusion criteria. Parent/carer reported children’s CS using open-text questions (e.g., describe “best things” about your child) and questionnaires analogous to CS framework. Autistic adults used self-report measures such as the Values-in-Action Survey, or Temperament and Character Inventory. Parent/carer reports of CS in autistic children and young people mostly included Humanity strengths (e.g., Love, Kindness), whereas autistic adults’ self-report endorsed a greater diversity of CS (e.g., Fairness, Curiosity, Honesty). Only six studies explored the association between CS and wellbeing/life satisfaction. Summary The use of CS-specific assessment tools in autism research is limited to date. Centred around autistic voices, future research can triangulate information from multiple informants across different contexts to further explore environmental barriers and facilitators for CS development over time, to create more opportunities for authentic strengths expression.

Current Developmental Disorders ReportsVol. 12(1)
University of Oxford (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Do We Know about Character Strengths in Autistic People? A Systematic Review — Jiedi Lei, Daniela Krouzkova · Current Developmental Disorders Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS