Supports for preservice teachers’ metacognitive monitoring and explanations of fraction comparisons

The ability to provide clear and comprehensive instructional explanations on mathematical concepts is key to supporting student learning in the classroom. This is especially important when teaching content that students most often struggle with. A large body of literature has established the challenges that elementary students face with developing fraction magnitude concepts. More recent work points to the struggles that both pre- and in-service teachers have with fraction magnitude. Though much work exists on interventions for students in supporting their fraction understanding, there is a dearth of literature on how to support teachers’ provisions of high quality explanations. We designed and evaluated the effectiveness of three instructional supports on elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) revision and improvements of their explanations of fraction concepts. We also examined their metacognitive monitoring and calibration skills as they relate to the revision process. Elementary PSTs were instructed to identify the larger of two fractions and then explain and justify their choice. They had an opportunity to revise after examining different instructional supports depending on their condition. We found that PSTs who were provided with instructional supports that provided a correct and complete exemplar of a fraction magnitude comparison showed greater improvements in their explanations than those who studied example explanations that displayed common misconceptions and errors. Correct and complete exemplars also supported greater detection and correction of errors and omissions in their explanations than those provided with a list of steps focused on structural aspects of the explanation. Hedges’ g effect sizes ranged from medium to large (g = 0.64 to 0.95) for the three comparison tasks. Most PSTs also showed limitations in calibration, indicating over-confidence in the degree of completeness of their explanations at both time points. These findings can inform instructional materials design for pre-service teacher mathematics content courses as they learn how to monitor their own thinking and explain fraction comparisons to students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Instructional Science
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09773-0
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supports for preservice teachers’ metacognitive monitoring and explanations of fraction comparisons

Christina Barbieri, Amanda Jansen, Taylor-Paige Guba, Anne Morris
Instructional Science
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Supports for preservice teachers’ metacognitive monitoring and explanations of fraction comparisons

Christina Barbieri, Amanda Jansen, Taylor-Paige Guba, Anne Morris
article en

Abstract

The ability to provide clear and comprehensive instructional explanations on mathematical concepts is key to supporting student learning in the classroom. This is especially important when teaching content that students most often struggle with. A large body of literature has established the challenges that elementary students face with developing fraction magnitude concepts. More recent work points to the struggles that both pre- and in-service teachers have with fraction magnitude. Though much work exists on interventions for students in supporting their fraction understanding, there is a dearth of literature on how to support teachers’ provisions of high quality explanations. We designed and evaluated the effectiveness of three instructional supports on elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) revision and improvements of their explanations of fraction concepts. We also examined their metacognitive monitoring and calibration skills as they relate to the revision process. Elementary PSTs were instructed to identify the larger of two fractions and then explain and justify their choice. They had an opportunity to revise after examining different instructional supports depending on their condition. We found that PSTs who were provided with instructional supports that provided a correct and complete exemplar of a fraction magnitude comparison showed greater improvements in their explanations than those who studied example explanations that displayed common misconceptions and errors. Correct and complete exemplars also supported greater detection and correction of errors and omissions in their explanations than those provided with a list of steps focused on structural aspects of the explanation. Hedges’ g effect sizes ranged from medium to large (g = 0.64 to 0.95) for the three comparison tasks. Most PSTs also showed limitations in calibration, indicating over-confidence in the degree of completeness of their explanations at both time points. These findings can inform instructional materials design for pre-service teacher mathematics content courses as they learn how to monitor their own thinking and explain fraction comparisons to students.

Instructional ScienceVol. 54(1)
University of Delaware (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.