Working together to achieve greater quality and safety in healthcare; interweaving Quality Improvement, Lean Six Sigma and Human Factors Ergonomics: a viewpoint paper

Purpose Many efforts to improve patient safety across the healthcare system over the last 20 years have not met their desired objectives. Transformational and courageous leadership is needed to encourage thinking at the macro, meso and micro system levels to identify what are the best approaches to change at different system levels that will ultimately enable improvements in patient safety. In this viewpoint we explore Quality Improvement (QI), Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and Human Factors Ergonomics (HFE), as approaches to change and improvement. Design/methodology/approach As authors we are experts in QI, LSS and HFE and this paper has arisen out of much dialogue between us aimed at developing a shared understanding and appreciation of QI, LSS and HFE and how these approaches could work together towards the goal of improved quality of care and patient safety. We draw on the literature and case studies that we have authored using these three approaches. Findings The findings are presented along a number of key areas including: defining the approaches and understanding their theoretical underpinnings; outlining what type of changes are suited to each approach including giving some case study examples; outlining how each approach tackles key issues in change and improvement including understanding context, developing, implementing and evaluating change. Practical implications We believe that QI, LSS and HFE approaches to change are complementary and synergistic and that they do not contradict each other. Through prioritising the well-being of both patients and staff, and fostering cultures that promote collaboration, innovation and resilience, they can enable healthcare organisations to more effectively achieve their goals of improved safety, efficiency and human well-being. In this viewpoint we propose that there is room for the three approaches to be adopted in healthcare for different purposes and at different system levels depending on existing capability and capacity. Originality/value Sharing understanding of QI, LSS and HFE and what each approach can offer, respecting the complementarity between them and the possibility of achieving more by working together and interweaving these approaches, can help us all to reap greater benefits for patient safety and care quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-06-2025-0077
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working together to achieve greater quality and safety in healthcare; interweaving Quality Improvement, Lean Six Sigma and Human Factors Ergonomics: a viewpoint paper

Nick McDonald, Úna Geary, Seán Paul Teeling, Margaret Codd et al.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Working together to achieve greater quality and safety in healthcare; interweaving Quality Improvement, Lean Six Sigma and Human Factors Ergonomics: a viewpoint paper

Nick McDonald, Úna Geary, Seán Paul Teeling, Margaret Codd, Mary Browne, John Fitzsimons, Angela O’Dea, Marie Elizabeth Ward
article en

Abstract

Purpose Many efforts to improve patient safety across the healthcare system over the last 20 years have not met their desired objectives. Transformational and courageous leadership is needed to encourage thinking at the macro, meso and micro system levels to identify what are the best approaches to change at different system levels that will ultimately enable improvements in patient safety. In this viewpoint we explore Quality Improvement (QI), Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and Human Factors Ergonomics (HFE), as approaches to change and improvement. Design/methodology/approach As authors we are experts in QI, LSS and HFE and this paper has arisen out of much dialogue between us aimed at developing a shared understanding and appreciation of QI, LSS and HFE and how these approaches could work together towards the goal of improved quality of care and patient safety. We draw on the literature and case studies that we have authored using these three approaches. Findings The findings are presented along a number of key areas including: defining the approaches and understanding their theoretical underpinnings; outlining what type of changes are suited to each approach including giving some case study examples; outlining how each approach tackles key issues in change and improvement including understanding context, developing, implementing and evaluating change. Practical implications We believe that QI, LSS and HFE approaches to change are complementary and synergistic and that they do not contradict each other. Through prioritising the well-being of both patients and staff, and fostering cultures that promote collaboration, innovation and resilience, they can enable healthcare organisations to more effectively achieve their goals of improved safety, efficiency and human well-being. In this viewpoint we propose that there is room for the three approaches to be adopted in healthcare for different purposes and at different system levels depending on existing capability and capacity. Originality/value Sharing understanding of QI, LSS and HFE and what each approach can offer, respecting the complementarity between them and the possibility of achieving more by working together and interweaving these approaches, can help us all to reap greater benefits for patient safety and care quality.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
University College Dublin (IE), Trinity College (CA), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin (IE), Temple Street Children's University Hospital (IE), Health Service Executive (IE), St. James's Hospital (IE), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.