Methodological quality of systematic intervention reviews on vaccination
The findings underscore the critical methodological shortcomings in vaccination-related SRs. Future efforts should prioritize adherence to established methodological standards and transparency, to enhance the impact of SRs in individual and decision-making.
Authors
- Louise Henaff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9454-2192)
- Antonia Pilic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-7982)
- O. Wichmann
- Madeleine Batke
- Vanessa Piechotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-6898)
- Christoph A. Steffen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0777-5047)
- Thomas Harder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8880-6217)
- Hanna Helene Linß
- Catalina Hamon Pinilla
- Amrita John
- Nina Rehr
- Iksha Thebe
Institutions
- Robert Koch Institute (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- World Health Organization (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2026-01-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-03052-2
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00