Non-Institutional Governance, Ideology, and Redistribution: The Political Economy of Inequality in the Middle East

This paper examines the political economy of redistribution by analyzing how ideological commitments are translated into redistributive policies under conditions of non-institutional governance. While ideology provides normative justification for social justice, its practical effects are heavily mediated by governance structures. In contexts characterized by non-institutional governance—such as clientelism, electoral populism, and cronyism—redistributive commitments are often distorted, redirected toward particularistic groups, or neutralized. Using qualitative documentary analysis and secondary indicators of income inequality, poverty, social spending, and fiscal progressivity, this study demonstrates that non-institutional governance weakens the capacity of redistribution to reduce inequality. The paper contributes to political economy by highlighting governance structure as a key moderating variable linking ideology to redistributive outcomes in the Middle East

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18172184
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Institutional Governance, Ideology, and Redistribution: The Political Economy of Inequality in the Middle East

ghabel rahmat fatemeh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Non-Institutional Governance, Ideology, and Redistribution: The Political Economy of Inequality in the Middle East

ghabel rahmat fatemeh
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the political economy of redistribution by analyzing how ideological commitments are translated into redistributive policies under conditions of non-institutional governance. While ideology provides normative justification for social justice, its practical effects are heavily mediated by governance structures. In contexts characterized by non-institutional governance—such as clientelism, electoral populism, and cronyism—redistributive commitments are often distorted, redirected toward particularistic groups, or neutralized. Using qualitative documentary analysis and secondary indicators of income inequality, poverty, social spending, and fiscal progressivity, this study demonstrates that non-institutional governance weakens the capacity of redistribution to reduce inequality. The paper contributes to political economy by highlighting governance structure as a key moderating variable linking ideology to redistributive outcomes in the Middle East

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.